These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28784759)

  • 1. Chaperonin GroEL accelerates protofibril formation and decorates fibrils of the Het-s prion protein.
    Wälti MA; Schmidt T; Murray DT; Wang H; Hinshaw JE; Clore GM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Aug; 114(34):9104-9109. PubMed ID: 28784759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suppression of amyloid fibrils using the GroEL apical domain.
    Ojha B; Fukui N; Hongo K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
    Sci Rep; 2016 Aug; 6():31041. PubMed ID: 27488469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterisation of mutations in GroES that allow GroEL to function as a single ring.
    Liu H; Kovács E; Lund PA
    FEBS Lett; 2009 Jul; 583(14):2365-71. PubMed ID: 19545569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reaction Cycle of Chaperonin GroEL via Symmetric "Football" Intermediate.
    Taguchi H
    J Mol Biol; 2015 Sep; 427(18):2912-8. PubMed ID: 25900372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Football- and bullet-shaped GroEL-GroES complexes coexist during the reaction cycle.
    Sameshima T; Ueno T; Iizuka R; Ishii N; Terada N; Okabe K; Funatsu T
    J Biol Chem; 2008 Aug; 283(35):23765-73. PubMed ID: 18567585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chaperonin-Assisted Protein Folding: Relative Population of Asymmetric and Symmetric GroEL:GroES Complexes.
    Haldar S; Gupta AJ; Yan X; Miličić G; Hartl FU; Hayer-Hartl M
    J Mol Biol; 2015 Jun; 427(12):2244-55. PubMed ID: 25912285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of the structure of GroES and its interaction with GroEL.
    Valencia A; Hubbard TJ; Muga A; Bañuelos S; Llorca O; Carrascosa JL; Valpuesta JM
    Proteins; 1995 Jul; 22(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 7479694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective ATPase activity and moderate chaperonin-cochaperonin interaction are important for the functional single-ring chaperonin system.
    Illingworth M; Salisbury J; Li W; Lin D; Chen L
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2015 Oct; 466(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 26271593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gly192 at hinge 2 site in the chaperonin GroEL plays a pivotal role in the dynamic apical domain movement that leads to GroES binding and efficient encapsulation of substrate proteins.
    Machida K; Fujiwara R; Tanaka T; Sakane I; Hongo K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2009 Sep; 1794(9):1344-54. PubMed ID: 19130907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single-molecule study on the decay process of the football-shaped GroEL-GroES complex using zero-mode waveguides.
    Sameshima T; Iizuka R; Ueno T; Wada J; Aoki M; Shimamoto N; Ohdomari I; Tanii T; Funatsu T
    J Biol Chem; 2010 Jul; 285(30):23159-64. PubMed ID: 20511221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probing the mechanism of inhibition of amyloid-β(1-42)-induced neurotoxicity by the chaperonin GroEL.
    Wälti MA; Steiner J; Meng F; Chung HS; Louis JM; Ghirlando R; Tugarinov V; Nath A; Clore GM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Dec; 115(51):E11924-E11932. PubMed ID: 30509980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors governing the substrate recognition by GroEL chaperone: a sequence correlation approach.
    Chaudhuri TK; Gupta P
    Cell Stress Chaperones; 2005; 10(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 15832945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Denatured proteins facilitate the formation of the football-shaped GroEL-(GroES)2 complex.
    Sameshima T; Iizuka R; Ueno T; Funatsu T
    Biochem J; 2010 Mar; 427(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 20121703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Active cage mechanism of chaperonin-assisted protein folding demonstrated at single-molecule level.
    Gupta AJ; Haldar S; Miličić G; Hartl FU; Hayer-Hartl M
    J Mol Biol; 2014 Jul; 426(15):2739-54. PubMed ID: 24816391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probing dynamics and conformational change of the GroEL-GroES complex by 13C NMR spectroscopy.
    Nishida N; Motojima F; Idota M; Fujikawa H; Yoshida M; Shimada I; Kato K
    J Biochem; 2006 Oct; 140(4):591-8. PubMed ID: 16963786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Substrate polypeptide presents a load on the apical domains of the chaperonin GroEL.
    Motojima F; Chaudhry C; Fenton WA; Farr GW; Horwich AL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Oct; 101(42):15005-12. PubMed ID: 15479763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anisotropic intersubunit and inter-ring interactions revealed in the native bullet-shaped chaperonin complex from Thermus thermophilus.
    Ishii N; Sato T
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2013 Apr; 1830(4):2907-16. PubMed ID: 23313842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The GroEL-GroES Chaperonin Machine: A Nano-Cage for Protein Folding.
    Hayer-Hartl M; Bracher A; Hartl FU
    Trends Biochem Sci; 2016 Jan; 41(1):62-76. PubMed ID: 26422689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mapping pathways of allosteric communication in GroEL by analysis of correlated mutations.
    Kass I; Horovitz A
    Proteins; 2002 Sep; 48(4):611-7. PubMed ID: 12211028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fibril formation of hsp10 homologue proteins and determination of fibril core regions: differences in fibril core regions dependent on subtle differences in amino acid sequence.
    Yagi H; Sato A; Yoshida A; Hattori Y; Hara M; Shimamura J; Sakane I; Hongo K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Apr; 377(5):1593-606. PubMed ID: 18329043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.