140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28785367)
1. Prediction-Oriented Marker Selection (PROMISE): With Application to High-Dimensional Regression.
Kim S; Baladandayuthapani V; Lee JJ
Stat Biosci; 2017 Jun; 9(1):217-245. PubMed ID: 28785367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of clinically relevant features in hypertensive patients using penalized regression: a case study of cardiovascular events.
Garcia-Carretero R; Barquero-Perez O; Mora-Jimenez I; Soguero-Ruiz C; Goya-Esteban R; Ramos-Lopez J
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Sep; 57(9):2011-2026. PubMed ID: 31346948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variable selection in social-environmental data: sparse regression and tree ensemble machine learning approaches.
Handorf E; Yin Y; Slifker M; Lynch S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Dec; 20(1):302. PubMed ID: 33302880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the lasso and the elastic net in genome-wide association studies.
Waldmann P; Mészáros G; Gredler B; Fuerst C; Sölkner J
Front Genet; 2013; 4():270. PubMed ID: 24363662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regularized group regression methods for genomic prediction: Bridge, MCP, SCAD, group bridge, group lasso, sparse group lasso, group MCP and group SCAD.
Ogutu JO; Piepho HP
BMC Proc; 2014; 8(Suppl 5):S7. PubMed ID: 25519521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robust estimation of the expected survival probabilities from high-dimensional Cox models with biomarker-by-treatment interactions in randomized clinical trials.
Ternès N; Rotolo F; Michiels S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 May; 17(1):83. PubMed ID: 28532387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accounting for grouped predictor variables or pathways in high-dimensional penalized Cox regression models.
Belhechmi S; Bin R; Rotolo F; Michiels S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):277. PubMed ID: 32615919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical extensions of the lasso penalty to reduce the false discovery rate in high-dimensional Cox regression models.
Ternès N; Rotolo F; Michiels S
Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(15):2561-73. PubMed ID: 26970107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefits of dimension reduction in penalized regression methods for high-dimensional grouped data: a case study in low sample size.
Ajana S; Acar N; Bretillon L; Hejblum BP; Jacqmin-Gadda H; Delcourt C;
Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(19):3628-3634. PubMed ID: 30931473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Penalized Regression and Risk Prediction in Genome-Wide Association Studies.
Austin E; Pan W; Shen X
Stat Anal Data Min; 2013 Aug; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 24348893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction-oriented prognostic biomarker discovery with survival machine learning methods.
Yao S; Cao B; Li T; Kalos D; Yuan Y; Wang X
NAR Genom Bioinform; 2023 Jun; 5(2):lqad055. PubMed ID: 37332657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Boosting the discriminatory power of sparse survival models via optimization of the concordance index and stability selection.
Mayr A; Hofner B; Schmid M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 17():288. PubMed ID: 27444890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-dimensional regression in practice: an empirical study of finite-sample prediction, variable selection and ranking.
Wang F; Mukherjee S; Richardson S; Hill SM
Stat Comput; 2020; 30(3):697-719. PubMed ID: 32132772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regularized structural equation modeling with stability selection.
Li X; Jacobucci R
Psychol Methods; 2022 Aug; 27(4):497-518. PubMed ID: 33507766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-dimensional Cox models: the choice of penalty as part of the model building process.
Benner A; Zucknick M; Hielscher T; Ittrich C; Mansmann U
Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):50-69. PubMed ID: 20166132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved Variable Selection Algorithm Using a LASSO-Type Penalty, with an Application to Assessing Hepatitis B Infection Relevant Factors in Community Residents.
Guo P; Zeng F; Hu X; Zhang D; Zhu S; Deng Y; Hao Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134151. PubMed ID: 26214802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SuRF: A new method for sparse variable selection, with application in microbiome data analysis.
Liu L; Gu H; Van Limbergen J; Kenney T
Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(4):897-919. PubMed ID: 33219557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust Huber-LASSO for improved prediction of protein, metabolite and gene expression levels relying on individual genotype data.
Deutelmoser H; Scherer D; Brenner H; Waldenberger M; ; Suhre K; Kastenmüller G; Lorenzo Bermejo J
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33063116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal false discovery rate control for likelihood-based penalized regression models.
Miller RE; Breheny P
Biom J; 2019 Jul; 61(4):889-901. PubMed ID: 30742712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
