These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28785367)
21. Prediction of early breast cancer metastasis from DNA microarray data using high-dimensional cox regression models. Zemmour C; Bertucci F; Finetti P; Chetrit B; Birnbaum D; Filleron T; Boher JM Cancer Inform; 2015; 14(Suppl 2):129-38. PubMed ID: 25983547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator type methods for the identification of serum biomarkers of overweight and obesity: simulation and application. Vasquez MM; Hu C; Roe DJ; Chen Z; Halonen M; Guerra S BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):154. PubMed ID: 27842498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. IPF-LASSO: Integrative Boulesteix AL; De Bin R; Jiang X; Fuchs M Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():7691937. PubMed ID: 28546826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Stability selection for mixed effect models with large numbers of predictor variables: A simulation study. Hyde R; O'Grady L; Green M Prev Vet Med; 2022 Sep; 206():105714. PubMed ID: 35843027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. GWASinlps: non-local prior based iterative SNP selection tool for genome-wide association studies. Sanyal N; Lo MT; Kauppi K; Djurovic S; Andreassen OA; Johnson VE; Chen CH Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 35(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 29931045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bayesian LASSO, scale space and decision making in association genetics. Pasanen L; Holmström L; Sillanpää MJ PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0120017. PubMed ID: 25856391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. TIMSS 2011 Student and Teacher Predictors for Mathematics Achievement Explored and Identified via Elastic Net. Yoo JE Front Psychol; 2018; 9():317. PubMed ID: 29599736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Enhancing the Lasso Approach for Developing a Survival Prediction Model Based on Gene Expression Data. Kaneko S; Hirakawa A; Hamada C Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():259474. PubMed ID: 26146513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Resampling procedures to identify important SNPs using a consensus approach. Pardy C; Motyer A; Wilson S BMC Proc; 2011 Nov; 5 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S59. PubMed ID: 22373247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance and robustness of penalized and unpenalized methods for genetic prediction of complex human disease. Abraham G; Kowalczyk A; Zobel J; Inouye M Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 37(2):184-95. PubMed ID: 23203348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Identification of biomarker-by-treatment interactions in randomized clinical trials with survival outcomes and high-dimensional spaces. Ternès N; Rotolo F; Heinze G; Michiels S Biom J; 2017 Jul; 59(4):685-701. PubMed ID: 27862181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sparse Regression by Projection and Sparse Discriminant Analysis. Qi X; Luo R; Carroll RJ; Zhao H J Comput Graph Stat; 2015 Apr; 24(2):416-438. PubMed ID: 26345204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Genomic selection for adjacent genetic markers of yorkshire pigs using regularized regression approaches. Park M; Kim TH; Cho ES; Kim H; Oh HS Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2014 Dec; 27(12):1678-83. PubMed ID: 25358359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Approaches to Regularized Regression - A Comparison between Gradient Boosting and the Lasso. Hepp T; Schmid M; Gefeller O; Waldmann E; Mayr A Methods Inf Med; 2016 Oct; 55(5):422-430. PubMed ID: 27626931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers. Greenwood CJ; Youssef GJ; Letcher P; Macdonald JA; Hagg LJ; Sanson A; Mcintosh J; Hutchinson DM; Toumbourou JW; Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M; Olsson CA PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242730. PubMed ID: 33216811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of the modified unbounded penalty and the LASSO to select predictive genes of response to chemotherapy in breast cancer. Collignon O; Han J; An H; Oh S; Lee Y PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204897. PubMed ID: 30273405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Genomic Selection Models to Predict Flowering Time and Spike Grain Number in Two Hexaploid Wheat Doubled Haploid Populations. Thavamanikumar S; Dolferus R; Thumma BR G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Jul; 5(10):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26206349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]