These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28785641)

  • 1. Septal rebound stretch as predictor of echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Ghani A; Delnoy PPHM; Adiyaman A; Ottervanger JP; Ramdat Misier AR; Smit JJJ; Elvan A
    Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc; 2015 Jun; 7():22-27. PubMed ID: 28785641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The value of septal rebound stretch analysis for the prediction of volumetric response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Salden OAE; Zweerink A; Wouters P; Allaart CP; Geelhoed B; de Lange FJ; Maass AH; Rienstra M; Vernooy K; Vos MA; Meine M; Prinzen FW; Cramer MJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jan; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 32699908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of strain parameters in dyssynchronous heart failure between speckle tracking echocardiography vendor systems.
    van Everdingen WM; Maass AH; Vernooy K; Meine M; Allaart CP; De Lange FJ; Teske AJ; Geelhoed B; Rienstra M; Van Gelder IC; Vos MA; Cramer MJ
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2017 Oct; 15(1):25. PubMed ID: 29047378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanistic evaluation of echocardiographic dyssynchrony indices: patient data combined with multiscale computer simulations.
    Lumens J; Leenders GE; Cramer MJ; De Boeck BW; Doevendans PA; Prinzen FW; Delhaas T
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jul; 5(4):491-9. PubMed ID: 22661491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Septal rebound stretch is a strong predictor of outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Leenders GE; De Boeck BW; Teske AJ; Meine M; Bogaard MD; Prinzen FW; Doevendans PA; Cramer MJ
    J Card Fail; 2012 May; 18(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 22555272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Echocardiographic Prediction of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response Requires Analysis of Both Mechanical Dyssynchrony and Right Ventricular Function: A Combined Analysis of Patient Data and Computer Simulations.
    van Everdingen WM; Walmsley J; Cramer MJ; van Hagen I; De Boeck BWL; Meine M; Delhaas T; Doevendans PA; Prinzen FW; Lumens J; Leenders GE
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2017 Oct; 30(10):1012-1020.e2. PubMed ID: 28801203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between two-dimensional speckle-tracking septal strain and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and left bundle branch block: a prospective pilot study.
    Maréchaux S; Guiot A; Castel AL; Guyomar Y; Semichon M; Delelis F; Heuls S; Ennezat PV; Graux P; Tribouilloy C
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 May; 27(5):501-11. PubMed ID: 24513239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac resynchronization therapy restored ventricular septal myocardial perfusion and enhanced ventricular remodeling in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy presenting with left bundle branch block.
    Ogano M; Iwasaki YK; Tanabe J; Takagi H; Umemoto T; Hayashi M; Miyauchi Y; Shimizu W
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 May; 11(5):836-41. PubMed ID: 24561161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does mechanical dyssynchrony in addition to QRS area ensure sustained response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?
    Wouters PC; van Everdingen WM; Vernooy K; Geelhoed B; Allaart CP; Rienstra M; Maass AH; Vos MA; Prinzen FW; Meine M; Cramer MJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Nov; 23(12):1628-1635. PubMed ID: 34871385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Atrioventricular delay programming and the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in MADIT-CRT.
    Brenyo A; Kutyifa V; Moss AJ; Mathias A; Barsheshet A; Pouleur AC; Knappe D; McNitt S; Polonsky B; Huang DT; Solomon SD; Zareba W; Goldenberg I
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Aug; 10(8):1136-43. PubMed ID: 23712031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Left ventricular dimensions predict risk of appropriate shocks but not mortality in cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator recipients with left bundle-branch block and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
    Adelstein EC; Schwartzman D; Jain S; Bazaz R; Wang NC; Saba S
    Europace; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1689-1694. PubMed ID: 27856539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are changes in the extent of left ventricular dyssynchrony as assessed by speckle tracking associated with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?
    Ghani A; Delnoy PP; Ottervanger JP; Ramdat Misier AR; Smit JJ; Adiyaman A; Elvan A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 32(4):553-61. PubMed ID: 26585749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incremental value of inefficient deformation indices for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Chan YH; Wu LS; Kuo CT; Wang CL; Yeh YH; Ho WJ; Hsu LA
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2013 Mar; 26(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 23218965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Echocardiographic markers of dyssynchrony as predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy - a pilot study.
    Kuznetsov VA; Soldatova AM; Kasprzak JD; Krinochkin DV; Melnikov NN
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2018 Oct; 16(1):24. PubMed ID: 30285762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of the right ventricular lead position on clinical outcome and on the incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with CRT-D.
    Kutyifa V; Bloch Thomsen PE; Huang DT; Rosero S; Tompkins C; Jons C; McNitt S; Polonsky B; Shah A; Merkely B; Solomon SD; Moss AJ; Zareba W; Klein HU
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Dec; 10(12):1770-7. PubMed ID: 23973954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strain-time curve analysis by speckle tracking echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Insight into the pathophysiology of responders vs. non-responders.
    To AC; Benatti RD; Sato K; Grimm RA; Thomas JD; Wilkoff BL; Agler D; Popović ZB
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2016 Apr; 14():14. PubMed ID: 27090784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictors of positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Rinkuniene D; Bucyte S; Ceseviciute K; Abramavicius S; Baronaite-Dudoniene K; Laukaitiene J; Kazakevicius T; Zabiela V; Sileikis V; Puodziukynas A; Jurkevicius R
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2014 Apr; 14():55. PubMed ID: 24779476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response predictors to cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic heart failure: a 10-year-cardiovascular center experience.
    Plata-Corona JC; Solis-Jiménez F; Flores-Flamand M; Dattoli-García CA; Priego-Ranero ÁA; Sierra-Lara JD; Sierra-Fernández CR
    Arch Cardiol Mex; 2024; 94(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 38507305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Risum N
    Dan Med J; 2014 Dec; 61(12):B4981. PubMed ID: 25441737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the presence of left bundle branch block and absence of scar in the posterolateral wall of the left ventricle.
    de Sá Junior IM; Pachón Mateos JC; Pachón Mateos JC; Vargas RNA
    Am J Cardiovasc Dis; 2020; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 32411502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.