These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28785778)
1. Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy. Dandolu V; Pathak P Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 28785778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications. Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia. Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inpatient Hospital Costs and Route of Hysterectomy for Management of Benign Uterine Disease in the 90-Day Global Billing Period. Bauer HH; Sahmoud A; Rhodes SP; Sheyn D Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Aug; 144(2):266-274. PubMed ID: 38870524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Approaches for hysterectomy and implementation of robot-assisted surgery in benign gynaecological disease: A cost analysis study in a large university hospital. Delameilleure M; Timmerman S; Vandoren C; Ledger A; Vansteenkiste N; Dewilde K; Page AS; Housmans S; Van den Bosch T; Deprest J; Froyman W Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Oct; 301():105-113. PubMed ID: 39116478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health resource use after robot-assisted surgery vs open and conventional laparoscopic techniques in oncology: analysis of English secondary care data for radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy. Hughes D; Camp C; O'Hara J; Adshead J BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):940-7. PubMed ID: 26696305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical Complications and Hospital Costs in Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy: Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Andiman SE; Bui AH; Ascher-Walsh C; Wright JD; Xu X Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 May; 28(5):e142-e148. PubMed ID: 35113048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions. Tapper AM; Hannola M; Zeitlin R; Isojärvi J; Sintonen H; Ikonen TS Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jun; 177():1-10. PubMed ID: 24703710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma. Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open approach performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center. Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Fachechi G; Corso S; Pirovano C; Trio C; Villa M; Turoli D; Youssef A J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):115-121. PubMed ID: 27460843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy. Winter ML; Leu SY; Lagrew DC; Bustillo G J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 26530837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the United States: Trends and Factors Associated With Approach Selection. Desai VB; Guo XM; Fan L; Wright JD; Xu X J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):151-158.e1. PubMed ID: 27614151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs. Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospital costs of total vaginal hysterectomy compared with other minimally invasive hysterectomy. Dayaratna S; Goldberg J; Harrington C; Leiby BE; McNeil JM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 210(2):120.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24060444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy. Smorgick N; Patzkowsky KE; Hoffman MR; Advincula AP; Song AH; As-Sanie S Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jan; 289(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 23839534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health care cost consequences of using robot technology for hysterectomy: a register-based study of consecutive patients during 2006-2013. Laursen KR; Hyldgård VB; Jensen PT; Søgaard R J Robot Surg; 2018 Jun; 12(2):283-294. PubMed ID: 28695441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis. Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]