107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28785960)
1. Spine labeling in MRI via regularized distribution matching.
Hojjat SP; Ayed I; Garvin GJ; Punithakumar K
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Nov; 12(11):1911-1922. PubMed ID: 28785960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spine labeling in axial magnetic resonance imaging via integral kernels.
Miles B; Ben Ayed I; Hojjat SP; Wang MH; Li S; Fenster A; Garvin GJ
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2016 Dec; 54():27-34. PubMed ID: 27743641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fully automatic cross-modality localization and labeling of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs in 3D spinal images.
Wimmer M; Major D; Novikov AA; Bühler K
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Oct; 13(10):1591-1603. PubMed ID: 30027302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated detection of spinal centrelines, vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs in CT and MR images of lumbar spine.
Stern D; Likar B; Pernus F; Vrtovec T
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(1):247-64. PubMed ID: 20009200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vertebral body segmentation in MRI via convex relaxation and distribution matching.
Ben Ayed I; Punithakumar K; Minhas R; Joshi KR; Garvin GJ
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 1):520-7. PubMed ID: 23285591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Left ventricle segmentation in MRI via convex relaxed distribution matching.
Nambakhsh CM; Yuan J; Punithakumar K; Goela A; Rajchl M; Peters TM; Ayed IB
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1010-24. PubMed ID: 23851075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic spinal cord localization, robust to MRI contrasts using global curve optimization.
Gros C; De Leener B; Dupont SM; Martin AR; Fehlings MG; Bakshi R; Tummala S; Auclair V; McLaren DG; Callot V; Cohen-Adad J; Sdika M
Med Image Anal; 2018 Feb; 44():215-227. PubMed ID: 29288983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lumbar spine segmentation in MR images: a dataset and a public benchmark.
van der Graaf JW; van Hooff ML; Buckens CFM; Rutten M; van Susante JLC; Kroeze RJ; de Kleuver M; van Ginneken B; Lessmann N
Sci Data; 2024 Mar; 11(1):264. PubMed ID: 38431692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fat-suppressed MR Imaging of the Spine for Metal Artifact Reduction at 3T: Comparison of STIR and Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction Fat-suppressed T
Lee YH; Hahn S; Kim E; Suh JS
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 15(4):371-378. PubMed ID: 26902679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of intervertebral displacement with a novel MRI-based modeling technique: Assessing measurement bias and reliability with a porcine spine model.
Mahato NK; Montuelle S; Goubeaux C; Cotton J; Williams S; Thomas J; Clark BC
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 38():77-86. PubMed ID: 28027908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atlas-based segmentation of degenerated lumbar intervertebral discs from MR images of the spine.
Michopoulou SK; Costaridou L; Panagiotopoulos E; Speller R; Panayiotakis G; Todd-Pokropek A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Sep; 56(9):2225-31. PubMed ID: 19369148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morphometry of the lower lumbar intervertebral discs and endplates: comparative analyses of new MRI data with previous findings.
Tang R; Gungor C; Sesek RF; Foreman KB; Gallagher S; Davis GA
Eur Spine J; 2016 Dec; 25(12):4116-4131. PubMed ID: 26873104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Personalized X-ray 3-D reconstruction of the scoliotic spine from hybrid statistical and image-based models.
Kadoury S; Cheriet F; Labelle H
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Sep; 28(9):1422-35. PubMed ID: 19336299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Multisegmental image fusion of the spine].
Kaminsky J; Rodt T; Zajaczek J; Donnerstag F; Zumkeller M
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Mar; 49(3):49-55. PubMed ID: 15106898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of a Rapid Lumbar Spine MRI Protocol Using 3D T2-Weighted SPACE Imaging Versus a Standard Protocol for Evaluation of Degenerative Changes of the Lumbar Spine.
Sayah A; Jay AK; Toaff JS; Makariou EV; Berkowitz F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Sep; 207(3):614-20. PubMed ID: 27275868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous localization of lumbar vertebrae and intervertebral discs with SVM-based MRF.
Oktay AB; Akgul YS
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Sep; 60(9):2375-83. PubMed ID: 23559025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. VolHOG: a volumetric object recognition approach based on bivariate histograms of oriented gradients for vertebra detection in cervical spine MRI.
Daenzer S; Freitag S; von Sachsen S; Steinke H; Groll M; Meixensberger J; Leimert M
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):082305. PubMed ID: 25086554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvements in lumbar spine MRI at 3 T using parallel transmission.
Filippi CG; Carlson M; Johnson JM; Burbank HN; Alsofrom GF; Andrews T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Oct; 199(4):861-7. PubMed ID: 22997379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Control over structure-specific flexibility improves anatomical accuracy for point-based deformable registration in bladder cancer radiotherapy.
Wognum S; Bondar L; Zolnay AG; Chai X; Hulshof MC; Hoogeman MS; Bel A
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021702. PubMed ID: 23387725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FSE T2-weighted two-point Dixon technique for fat suppression in the lumbar spine: comparison with SPAIR technique.
Lee S; Choi DS; Shin HS; Baek HJ; Choi HC; Park SE
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(3):175-180. PubMed ID: 29770772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
