BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28786317)

  • 1. US Food and Drug Administration Clearance of Moderate-Risk Otolaryngologic Devices via the 510(k) Process, 1997-2016.
    Rathi VK; Gadkaree SK; Ross JS; Kozin ED; Sethi RK; Naunheim MR; Puram SV; Gray ST
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Oct; 157(4):608-617. PubMed ID: 28786317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval of High-Risk Otolaryngologic Devices, 2000-2014.
    Rathi VK; Wang B; Ross JS; Downing NS; Kesselheim AS; Gray ST
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Feb; 156(2):285-288. PubMed ID: 28093943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recalls of Moderate- and High-Risk Otolaryngologic Devices Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, 2003-2019.
    Talati IA; Parsa KM; Gao WZ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Nov; 167(5):832-838. PubMed ID: 35290135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postmarket Modifications of High-Risk Therapeutic Devices in Otolaryngology Cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration.
    Rathi VK; Ross JS; Samuel AM; Mehra S
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Sep; 153(3):400-8. PubMed ID: 26044785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How do Orthopaedic Devices Change After Their Initial FDA Premarket Approval?
    Samuel AM; Rathi VK; Grauer JN; Ross JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):1053-68. PubMed ID: 26584802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Otolaryngologic Prescription Drug Indications, 2005-2014.
    Rathi VK; Wang B; Ross JS; Downing NS; Kesselheim AS; Gray ST
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):683-692. PubMed ID: 28116974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics of Clinical Studies Conducted Over the Total Product Life Cycle of High-Risk Therapeutic Medical Devices Receiving FDA Premarket Approval in 2010 and 2011.
    Rathi VK; Krumholz HM; Masoudi FA; Ross JS
    JAMA; 2015 Aug; 314(6):604-12. PubMed ID: 26262798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Device Safety.
    Rathi VK; Gray ST
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 52(1):103-114. PubMed ID: 30245039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incremental Revisions across the Life Span of Ophthalmic Devices after Initial Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval, 1979-2015.
    Gopal AD; Rathi VK; Teng CC; Del Priore L; Ross JS
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Aug; 124(8):1237-1246. PubMed ID: 28501378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk of Recall Among Medical Devices Undergoing US Food and Drug Administration 510(k) Clearance and Premarket Approval, 2008-2017.
    Dubin JR; Simon SD; Norrell K; Perera J; Gowen J; Cil A
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e217274. PubMed ID: 33956132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lack of publicly available scientific evidence on the safety and effectiveness of implanted medical devices.
    Zuckerman D; Brown P; Das A
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Nov; 174(11):1781-7. PubMed ID: 25265047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Food and Drug Administration Efforts to Mitigate Contact Lens Discomfort.
    Hampton D; Green JA; Robboy M; Eydelman M
    Eye Contact Lens; 2017 Jan; 43(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 27941360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of FDA-Approved Orthopaedic Devices and Their Recalls.
    Day CS; Park DJ; Rozenshteyn FS; Owusu-Sarpong N; Gonzalez A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(6):517-24. PubMed ID: 26984921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orbital Implants Receiving Food and Drug Administration Premarket Notification.
    Corcoran Ruiz KM; Vaishnav YJ; Desautels J; Schaefer JL; Migliori ME; Yilmaz T
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 38(5):503-506. PubMed ID: 35699217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New orthopedic devices and the FDA.
    Sheth U; Nguyen NA; Gaines S; Bhandari M; Mehlman CT; Klein G
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2009; 19(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 20939777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FDA marketing claims, and the practitioner.
    Runner S
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2006 Mar; 6(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 17138391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective reporting in trials of high risk cardiovascular devices: cross sectional comparison between premarket approval summaries and published reports.
    Chang L; Dhruva SS; Chu J; Bero LA; Redberg RF
    BMJ; 2015 Jun; 350():h2613. PubMed ID: 26063311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical devices: US medical device regulation.
    Jarow JP; Baxley JH
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 25458071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical device recalls and the FDA approval process.
    Zuckerman DM; Brown P; Nissen SE
    Arch Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 171(11):1006-11. PubMed ID: 21321283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An overview of Food and Drug Administration regulation of drugs, biologics, and devices to be used for management of periodontal diseases.
    Tylenda CA; Weintraub M
    Ann Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 2(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9151539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.