These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28786402)

  • 1. Comparison of region-of-interest-averaged and pixel-averaged analysis of DCE-MRI data based on simulations and pre-clinical experiments.
    He D; Zamora M; Oto A; Karczmar GS; Fan X
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):N445-N459. PubMed ID: 28786402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signal intensity form of the Tofts model for quantitative analysis of prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data.
    Fan X; Chatterjee A; Medved M; Oto A; Karczmar GS
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jan; 66(2):025002. PubMed ID: 33181487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis.
    Galbraith SM; Lodge MA; Taylor NJ; Rustin GJ; Bentzen S; Stirling JJ; Padhani AR
    NMR Biomed; 2002 Apr; 15(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 11870909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra-individual comparison of different gadolinium-based contrast agents in the quantitative evaluation of C6 glioma with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Li Y; Liu G; Lou X; Chen Z; Ma L
    Sci China Life Sci; 2017 Jan; 60(1):11-15. PubMed ID: 28078511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
    Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simulation study comparing nine mathematical models of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI to the Parker model.
    He D; Xu L; Qian W; Clarke J; Fan X
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Jun; 41(2):507-518. PubMed ID: 29569210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A compact solution for estimation of physiological parameters from ultrafast prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
    He D; Fan X; Chatterjee A; Wang S; Medved M; Pineda FD; Yousuf A; Antic T; Oto A; Karczmar GS
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(15):155012. PubMed ID: 31220816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI in head and neck cancer patients: variability of the precontrast longitudinal relaxation time (T10).
    Craciunescu O; Brizel D; Cleland E; Yoo D; Muradyan N; Carroll M; Barboriak D; MacFall J
    Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2683-92. PubMed ID: 20632579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. R2* Relaxation Affects Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Cancer and Underestimates Treatment Response at 7 T.
    Kim J; Moestue SA; Bathen TF; Kim E
    Tomography; 2019 Sep; 5(3):308-319. PubMed ID: 31572792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlations of 3T DCE-MRI quantitative parameters with microvessel density in a human-colorectal-cancer xenograft mouse model.
    Ahn SJ; An CS; Koom WS; Song HT; Suh JS
    Korean J Radiol; 2011; 12(6):722-30. PubMed ID: 22043155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
    Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of analytical and numerical analysis of the reference region model for DCE-MRI.
    Lee J; Cárdenas-Rodríguez J; Pagel MD; Platt S; Kent M; Zhao Q
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):845-53. PubMed ID: 24925838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
    Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: assessment of perfusion-related parameters compared to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Fujima N; Yoshida D; Sakashita T; Homma A; Tsukahara A; Tha KK; Kudo K; Shirato H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Dec; 32(10):1206-13. PubMed ID: 25131628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sampling requirements in DCE-MRI based analysis of high grade gliomas: simulations and clinical results.
    Larsson C; Kleppestø M; Rasmussen I; Salo R; Vardal J; Brandal P; Bjørnerud A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Apr; 37(4):818-29. PubMed ID: 23086710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in head-and-neck cancer: the impact of region of interest selection on the intra- and interpatient variability of pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Craciunescu OI; Yoo DS; Cleland E; Muradyan N; Carroll MD; MacFall JR; Barboriak DP; Brizel DM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(3):e345-50. PubMed ID: 21985945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model.
    Yankeelov TE; Luci JJ; Lepage M; Li R; Debusk L; Lin PC; Price RR; Gore JC
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):519-29. PubMed ID: 15919597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Region of interest and pixel-by-pixel analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters and time-intensity curve shapes: a comparison in chondroid tumors.
    Lavini C; Pikaart BP; de Jonge MC; Schaap GR; Maas M
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 27(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18619754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the effect of haematocrit-dependent arterial input functions on the accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Just N; Koh DM; D'Arcy J; Collins DJ; Leach MO
    NMR Biomed; 2011 Aug; 24(7):902-15. PubMed ID: 21290457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of DCE-MRI of murine model cancers with a low dose and high dose of contrast agent.
    Zhou X; Fan X; Mustafi D; Pineda F; Markiewicz E; Zamora M; Sheth D; Olopade OI; Oto A; Karczmar GS
    Phys Med; 2021 Jan; 81():31-39. PubMed ID: 33373779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.