These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28786843)

  • 1. An Appraisal of the Carlisle-Stouffer-Fisher Method for Assessing Study Data Integrity and Fraud.
    Mascha EJ; Vetter TR; Pittet JF
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1381-1385. PubMed ID: 28786843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals.
    Carlisle JB
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Aug; 72(8):944-952. PubMed ID: 28580651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrity of scientific data: transparency of clinical trial data.
    Moore N; Juillet Y; Bertoye PH;
    Therapie; 2007; 62(3):203-9, 211-6. PubMed ID: 17803887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of biostatistics in the prevention, detection and treatment of fraud in clinical trials.
    Buyse M; George SL; Evans S; Geller NL; Ranstam J; Scherrer B; Lesaffre E; Murray G; Edler L; Hutton J; Colton T; Lachenbruch P; Verma BL
    Stat Med; 1999 Dec; 18(24):3435-51. PubMed ID: 10611617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics of baseline frequency data in spinal RCTs do not suggest widespread non-random allocation.
    Levayer MMS; Chew GRP; Sheldrick KA; Diwan AD
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Sep; 32(9):3009-3014. PubMed ID: 37306800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Baseline P value distributions in randomized trials were uniform for continuous but not categorical variables.
    Bolland MJ; Gamble GD; Avenell A; Grey A; Lumley T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 112():67-76. PubMed ID: 31125614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A computationally simple central monitoring procedure, effectively applied to empirical trial data with known fraud.
    van den Bor RM; Vaessen PWJ; Oosterman BJ; Zuithoff NPA; Grobbee DE; Roes KCB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():59-69. PubMed ID: 28412468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Central statistical monitoring: detecting fraud in clinical trials.
    Pogue JM; Devereaux PJ; Thorlund K; Yusuf S
    Clin Trials; 2013 Apr; 10(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 23283577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medicine is plagued by untrustworthy clinical trials. How many studies are faked or flawed?
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2023 Jul; 619(7970):454-458. PubMed ID: 37464079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials.
    Al-Marzouki S; Evans S; Marshall T; Roberts I
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):267-70. PubMed ID: 16052019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the reliability of self-reported weight for the management of heart failure: application of fraud detection methods to a randomised trial of telemonitoring.
    Steventon A; Chaudhry SI; Lin Z; Mattera JA; Krumholz HM
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Apr; 17(1):43. PubMed ID: 28420352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data integrity, reliability and fraud in medical research.
    Baerlocher MO; O'Brien J; Newton M; Gautam T; Noble J
    Eur J Intern Med; 2010 Feb; 21(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 20122612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of methods for central statistical monitoring in clinical trials.
    Kirkwood AA; Cox T; Hackshaw A
    Clin Trials; 2013 Oct; 10(5):783-806. PubMed ID: 24130202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misinformation in the medical literature: what role do error and fraud play?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Aug; 37(8):498-503. PubMed ID: 21343631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The need to combat clinical fraud.
    Semple M; Kenkre J
    Nurs Stand; 2002 May 22-28; 16(36):39-42. PubMed ID: 12056196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors.
    George SL
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Feb; 21(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 26289019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions].
    Maisonneuve H
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):853-60. PubMed ID: 22836196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Cases of fraud in publications: From Darsee to Poldermans].
    Bonnet F; Samama CM
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):816-20. PubMed ID: 22727915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
    Mosimann JE
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies for dealing with fraud in clinical trials.
    Herson J
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Feb; 21(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 26194810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.