BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28786907)

  • 1. Planar Bone Scan Versus Computerized Tomography in Staging Locally Advanced Breast Cancer in Asymptomatic Patients: Does Bone Scan Change Patient Management Over Computerized Tomography?
    Bansal GJ; Vinayan Changaradil D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 28786907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of bone scan in addition to CT in patients with breast cancer selected for systemic staging.
    McCartan DP; Prichard RS; MacDermott RJ; Rothwell J; Geraghty J; Evoy D; Quinn CM; Skehan SJ; O'Doherty A; McDermott EW
    Br J Surg; 2016 Jun; 103(7):839-44. PubMed ID: 27004443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 99 m-Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of skeletal metastases.
    Chang CY; Gill CM; Joseph Simeone F; Taneja AK; Huang AJ; Torriani M; Bredella MA
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 25533313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Pretreatment Combined (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Staging on Radiation Therapy Treatment Decisions in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.
    Ng SP; David S; Alamgeer M; Ganju V
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Sep; 93(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 26279029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of diagnostic ability between (99m)Tc-MDP bone scan and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for bone metastasis in patients with small cell lung cancer.
    Lee JW; Lee SM; Lee HS; Kim YH; Bae WK
    Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 26(8):627-33. PubMed ID: 22729551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and SPECT/low-dose computerized tomography did not increase sensitivity or specificity compared to planar bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in advanced breast cancer.
    Haraldsen A; Bluhme H; Røhl L; Pedersen EM; Jensen AB; Hansen EB; Nellemann H; Rasmussen F; Morsing A
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2016 Jan; 36(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25257661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Indication for bone scans in early breast cancer staging].
    de la Cueva L; Liévano P; Navarro P; Arroyo E; Añaños M; González M; García MC; Fuerte A; Colmenarejo F; Baringo T; Abós MD
    Rev Esp Med Nucl; 2009; 28(6):273-7. PubMed ID: 19995533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone metastasis versus bone marrow metastasis? Integration of diagnosis by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission/computed tomography in advanced malignancy with super bone scan: two case reports and literature review.
    Lin CY; Chen YW; Chang CC; Yang WC; Huang CJ; Hou MF
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2013 Apr; 29(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 23541269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the PET/CT era: Do we still need the bone scan?
    Caglar M; Kupik O; Karabulut E; Høilund-Carlsen PF
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2016; 35(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 26514321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discordant findings in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: absolutely normal bone scans versus disseminated bone metastases on positron-emission tomography/computed tomography.
    Ak I; Sivrikoz MC; Entok E; Vardareli E
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Apr; 37(4):792-6. PubMed ID: 20015657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can 16-detector multislice CT exclude skeletal lesions during tumour staging? Implications for the cancer patient.
    Groves AM; Beadsmoore CJ; Cheow HK; Balan KK; Courtney HM; Kaptoge S; Win T; Harish S; Bearcroft PW; Dixon AK
    Eur Radiol; 2006 May; 16(5):1066-73. PubMed ID: 16402253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy in detecting bone metastasis in head and neck tumors.
    Al-Bulushi NK; Abouzied ME
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Jun; 37(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 26813992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in initial staging of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma with an emphasis on M staging.
    Mittal BR; Manohar K; Kashyap R; Bhattacharya A; Singh B; Singh G
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2011; 14(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 21761015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive value of excretory urography, ultrasonography, computerized tomography, and liver and bone scan in the staging of bilharzial bladder cancer in Saudi Arabia.
    Hanash KA; Bissada NK; Abla A; Esmail D; Dowling A
    Cancer; 1984 Jul; 54(1):172-6. PubMed ID: 6232995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incidental 99mTc MDP uptake in the intestines and intravenous CT contrast.
    Kim SJ; Choi JY; Lee JH; Hyun SH; Cho YS; Moon SH; Choe YS; Lee KH; Kim BT
    Nuklearmedizin; 2016 Aug; 55(4):166-71. PubMed ID: 26632485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT staging for breast cancer patients with poor prognostic tumours.
    James JJ; McMahon MA; Tennant SL; Cornford EJ
    Breast; 2012 Dec; 21(6):735-8. PubMed ID: 22959310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [What do clinicians do with the results of the systematic staging imaging at the time of the breast cancer diagnosis?].
    Turpin A; Mailliez A; Vennin P; Bonneterre J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 May; 42(5):325-30. PubMed ID: 24411340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of CE-FDG-PET/CT with CE-FDG-PET/MR in the evaluation of osseous metastases in breast cancer patients.
    Catalano OA; Nicolai E; Rosen BR; Luongo A; Catalano M; Iannace C; Guimaraes A; Vangel MG; Mahmood U; Soricelli A; Salvatore M
    Br J Cancer; 2015 Apr; 112(9):1452-60. PubMed ID: 25871331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectral parametric segmentation of contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT to detect bone metastasis: feasibility sensitivity study using whole-body bone scintigraphy.
    Lee YH; Kim S; Lim D; Suh JS; Song HT
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):458-64. PubMed ID: 24714734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Findings of computed tomography in stage IIB and IIC melanoma: a six-year retrospective study in the South-East of Scotland.
    Orfaniotis G; Mennie JC; Fairbairn N; Butterworth M
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Sep; 65(9):1216-9. PubMed ID: 22525255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.