319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28790039)
1. Answering medical questions at the point of care: a cross-sectional study comparing rapid decisions based on PubMed and Epistemonikos searches with evidence-based recommendations developed with the GRADE approach.
Izcovich A; Criniti JM; Popoff F; Ragusa MA; Gigler C; Gonzalez Malla C; Clavijo M; Manzotti M; Diaz M; Catalano HN; Neumann I; Guyatt G
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016113. PubMed ID: 28790039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of a GRADE-based medical question answering system on physician behaviour: a randomised controlled trial.
Izcovich A; Criniti JM; Ruiz JI; Catalano HN
Evid Based Med; 2015 Jun; 20(3):81-7. PubMed ID: 25841245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions.
Schardt C; Adams MB; Owens T; Keitz S; Fontelo P
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2007 Jun; 7():16. PubMed ID: 17573961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increasing the quantity and quality of searching for current best evidence to answer clinical questions: protocol and intervention design of the MacPLUS FS Factorial Randomized Controlled Trials.
Agoritsas T; Iserman E; Hobson N; Cohen N; Cohen A; Roshanov PS; Perez M; Cotoi C; Parrish R; Pullenayegum E; Wilczynski NL; Iorio A; Haynes RB
Implement Sci; 2014 Sep; 9():125. PubMed ID: 25239537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
Cheng JS; Lee MJ; Massicotte E; Ashman B; Gruenberg M; Pilcher LE; Skelly AC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S144-63. PubMed ID: 21952186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based databases versus primary medical literature: an in-house investigation on their optimal use.
Koonce TY; Giuse NB; Todd P
J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Oct; 92(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 15494755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach.
Neumann I; Santesso N; Akl EA; Rind DM; Vandvik PO; Alonso-Coello P; Agoritsas T; Mustafa RA; Alexander PE; Schünemann H; Guyatt GH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():45-55. PubMed ID: 26772609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.
Cunningham FG; Bangdiwala SI; Brown SS; Dean TM; Frederiksen M; Rowland Hogue CJ; King T; Spencer Lukacz E; McCullough LB; Nicholson W; Petit NF; Probstfield JL; Viguera AC; Wong CA; Zimmet SC
NIH Consens State Sci Statements; 2010 Mar; 27(3):1-42. PubMed ID: 20228855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Straight to the point: evaluation of a Point of Care Information (POCI) resource in answering disease-related questions.
Wasserman RL; Seger DL; Amato MG; Co Z; Mugal A; Rui A; Garabedian PM; Marceau M; Syrowatka A; Volk LA; Bates DW
J Med Libr Assoc; 2024 Jan; 112(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 38911524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinicians' perceptions of usefulness of the PubMed4Hh mobile device application for clinical decision making at the point of care: a pilot study.
Gartrell K; Brennan CW; Wallen GR; Liu F; Smith KG; Fontelo P
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 May; 18(1):27. PubMed ID: 29739392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multiple-scenario assessment of the effect of a continuous-care, guideline-based decision support system on clinicians' compliance to clinical guidelines.
Shalom E; Shahar Y; Parmet Y; Lunenfeld E
Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):248-62. PubMed ID: 25649843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consensus recommendations for systematic evaluation of drug-drug interaction evidence for clinical decision support.
Scheife RT; Hines LE; Boyce RD; Chung SP; Momper JD; Sommer CD; Abernethy DR; Horn JR; Sklar SJ; Wong SK; Jones G; Brown ML; Grizzle AJ; Comes S; Wilkins TL; Borst C; Wittie MA; Malone DC
Drug Saf; 2015 Feb; 38(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 25556085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. UpToDate adherence to GRADE criteria for strong recommendations: an analytical survey.
Agoritsas T; Merglen A; Heen AF; Kristiansen A; Neumann I; Brito JP; Brignardello-Petersen R; Alexander PE; Rind DM; Vandvik PO; Guyatt GH
BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e018593. PubMed ID: 29150475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Answers to questions posed during daily patient care are more likely to be answered by UpToDate than PubMed.
Hoogendam A; Stalenhoef AF; Robbé PF; Overbeke AJ
J Med Internet Res; 2008 Oct; 10(4):e29. PubMed ID: 18926978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinicians' assessments of the usefulness of online evidence to answer clinical questions.
Magrabi F; Westbrook JI; Coiera EW; Gosling AS
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):297-300. PubMed ID: 15360822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Answering family physicians' clinical questions using electronic medical databases.
Alper BS; Stevermer JJ; White DS; Ewigman BG
J Fam Pract; 2001 Nov; 50(11):960-5. PubMed ID: 11711012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence to Decision framework provides a structured "roadmap" for making GRADE guidelines recommendations.
Li SA; Alexander PE; Reljic T; Cuker A; Nieuwlaat R; Wiercioch W; Guyatt G; Schünemann HJ; Djulbegovic B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():103-112. PubMed ID: 30253221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of an evidence-based answering service on GPs and their patients: a pilot study.
Verhoeven AA; Schuling J
Health Info Libr J; 2004 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():27-35. PubMed ID: 15317573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
