These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28790949)

  • 1. A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview Benefit.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1252. PubMed ID: 28790949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():33-44. PubMed ID: 25976299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contingent visual marking by transients.
    Peterson MS; Belopolsky AV; Kramer AF
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):695-710. PubMed ID: 12956578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preview benefit survives a three-dimensional rotation of the rigid configuration of search items.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2019 Mar; 156():56-65. PubMed ID: 30682404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual marking: the effects of irrelevant changes on preview search.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Apr; 67(3):418-34. PubMed ID: 16119391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The preview benefit in single-feature and conjunction search: Constraints of visual marking.
    Meinhardt G; Persike M
    J Vis; 2015; 15(13):13. PubMed ID: 26382004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resisting change: the influence of luminance changes on visual marking and the preview benefit.
    Watson DG; Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1526-39. PubMed ID: 19064495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional Capture to a Singleton Distractor Degrades Visual Marking in Visual Search.
    Yamauchi K; Osugi T; Murakami I
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():801. PubMed ID: 28559878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual change with moving displays: more evidence for color feature map inhibition during preview search.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Aug; 29(4):779-92. PubMed ID: 12967221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fractionating the preview benefit in search: dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality.
    Humphreys GW; Watson DG; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):640-60. PubMed ID: 12075894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual marking for search: behavioral and event-related potential analyses.
    Jacobsen T; Humphreys GW; Schröger E; Roeber U
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):410-21. PubMed ID: 12421664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting preview search at isoluminance: new onsets are not necessary for the preview advantage.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Watson DG; Hulleman J
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1214-28. PubMed ID: 16502843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking.
    Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual marking across eye blinks.
    Irwin DE; Humphreys GW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Feb; 20(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 23073720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search.
    Humphreys GW; Olivers CN; Yoon EY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 16417687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A singleton distractor updates the inhibitory template for visual marking.
    Yamauchi K; Kawahara JI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():200-211. PubMed ID: 30530171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What is "marked" in visual marking? Evidence for effects of configuration in preview search.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ; Hulleman J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Aug; 65(6):982-96. PubMed ID: 14528904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The spatial distribution of inhibition in preview search.
    Osugi T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):851-61. PubMed ID: 19275913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search.
    Fenske MJ; Raymond JE; Kunar MA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):1055-61. PubMed ID: 15875975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in search: a time course analysis of visual marking using behavioural and functional imaging procedures.
    Humphreys GW; Kyllingsbaek S; Watson DG; Olivers CN; Law I; Paulson OB
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 May; 57(4):610-35. PubMed ID: 15204126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.