These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28791940)

  • 21. Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect.
    Suavansri K; Falchook AD; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Aug; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of traumatic brain injury on the allocation of vertical spatial attention.
    Hromas G; Polejaeva E; Sozda CN; Heilman KM; Schmalfuss IM; Perlstein WM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Feb; 42(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 31665971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Furukawa T; Tsukagoshi H
    Brain; 1989 Dec; 112 ( Pt 6)():1485-502. PubMed ID: 2597992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Trajectory of Pseudoneglect in Adults: A Systematic Review.
    Friedrich TE; Hunter PV; Elias LJ
    Neuropsychol Rev; 2018 Dec; 28(4):436-452. PubMed ID: 30460436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visuospatial Asymmetries Arise from Differences in the Onset Time of Perceptual Evidence Accumulation.
    Newman DP; Loughnane GM; Kelly SP; O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(12):3378-3385. PubMed ID: 28242798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hemispheric dominance for visuospatial attention does not predict the direction of pseudoneglect.
    Gerrits R; Verhelst H; Vingerhoets G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107634. PubMed ID: 32998020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Influence of Alertness on the Spatial Deployment of Visual Attention is Mediated by the Excitability of the Posterior Parietal Cortices.
    Paladini RE; Müri RM; Meichtry J; Nef T; Mast FW; Mosimann UP; Nyffeler T; Cazzoli D
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Jan; 27(1):233-243. PubMed ID: 28013233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neural correlates of visuospatial bias in patients with left hemisphere stroke: a causal functional contribution analysis based on game theory.
    Malherbe C; Umarova RM; Zavaglia M; Kaller CP; Beume L; Thomalla G; Weiller C; Hilgetag CC
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jul; 115():142-153. PubMed ID: 29031739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Structural Brain Correlations of Visuospatial and Visuoperceptual Tests in Parkinson's Disease.
    Garcia-Diaz AI; Segura B; Baggio HC; Marti MJ; Valldeoriola F; Compta Y; Bargallo N; Uribe C; Campabadal A; Abos A; Junque C
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2018 Jan; 24(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 28714429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. More far is more right: Manual and ocular line bisections, but not the Judd illusion, depend on radial space.
    Rinaldi L; Bertolini G; Bockisch CJ; Maravita A; Girelli L; Brugger P
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Apr; 122():34-44. PubMed ID: 29428805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lateralized pointing does not cause a cognitive bias.
    van der Ham IJM; Brummelman J; Aerts ME; de Haan AM; Dijkerman HC
    Cogn Process; 2018 Feb; 19(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 28871445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Age-related reduction of hemispheric lateralisation for spatial attention: An EEG study.
    Learmonth G; Benwell CSY; Thut G; Harvey M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jun; 153():139-151. PubMed ID: 28343987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The association between hemispheric specialization for language production and for spatial attention depends on left-hand preference strength.
    Zago L; Petit L; Mellet E; Jobard G; Crivello F; Joliot M; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt B):394-406. PubMed ID: 26626612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of hand and spatial conditions on visual line bisection.
    Fukatsu R; Fujii T; Kimura I; Saso S; Kogure K
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 1990 Aug; 161(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 2256106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Viewing of figurative paintings affects pseudoneglect as measured by line bisection.
    Ciricugno A; Ferrari C; Rusconi ML; Cattaneo Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3795-3803. PubMed ID: 33025464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Why we move to the right? The dominant hand motor-spatial bias.
    Daini R; Vallar G; Arduino LS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Oct; 147(10):1488-1502. PubMed ID: 30272464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The precision of experienced action video-game players: line bisection reveals reduced leftward response bias.
    Latham AJ; Patston LL; Tippett LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2193-8. PubMed ID: 25341651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of monocular viewing and eye dominance on spatial attention.
    Roth HL; Lora AN; Heilman KM
    Brain; 2002 Sep; 125(Pt 9):2023-35. PubMed ID: 12183348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Asymmetrical distractibility of global and focal visuospatial attention during segmental and total compound line bisections.
    Mosquera DM; Lamb DG; Garcia AM; Rodriguez JA; Correa LN; Salazar L; Schwartz ZJ; Cohen RA; Falchook AD; Heilman KM
    Neuropsychology; 2018 Oct; 32(7):843-849. PubMed ID: 29985016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.