These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28791977)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of ankaferd blood stopper, ferric sulfate, and formocresol as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: A clinical study.
    Ozmen B; Bayrak S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Jul; 20(7):832-838. PubMed ID: 28791977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of folk medicinal plant extract Ankaferd Blood Stopper(®) in vital primary molar pulpotomy.
    Yaman E; Görken F; Pinar Erdem A; Sepet E; Aytepe Z
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2012 Aug; 13(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 22883359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ferric sulphate and formocresol in pulpotomy of primary molars: long term follow-up study.
    Ibricevic H; Al-Jame Q
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Mar; 4(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 12870985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth.
    Markovic D; Zivojinovic V; Vucetic M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Sep; 6(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16216093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies in primary molars with formocresol, glutaraldehyde and ferric sulphate.
    Havale R; Anegundi RT; Indushekar K; Sudha P
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 23474578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy on vital primary teeth: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Olatosi OO; Sote EO; Orenuga OO
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 25666010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical study of ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth.
    Fei AL; Udin RD; Johnson R
    Pediatr Dent; 1991; 13(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 1843987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate as pulpotomy agents in deciduous teeth.
    Srinivasan D; Jayanthi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 22048576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sodium hypochlorite vs formocresol as pulpotomy medicaments in primary molars: 1-year follow-up.
    Shabzendedar M; Mazhari F; Alami M; Talebi M
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 23930631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and formocresol pulpotomies: a 24-month study.
    Erdem AP; Guven Y; Balli B; Ilhan B; Sepet E; Ulukapi I; Aktoren O
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 21703067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children.
    Dean JA; Mack RB; Fulkerson BT; Sanders BJ
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2002 May; 12(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 12028309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based assessment: evaluation of the formocresol versus ferric sulfate primary molar pulpotomy.
    Loh A; O'Hoy P; Tran X; Charles R; Hughes A; Kubo K; Messer LB
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(5):401-9. PubMed ID: 15460294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up.
    Sonmez D; Sari S; Cetinbaş T
    J Endod; 2008 Aug; 34(8):950-5. PubMed ID: 18634926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth.
    Smaïl-Faugeron V; Courson F; Durieux P; Muller-Bolla M; Glenny AM; Fron Chabouis H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; (8):CD003220. PubMed ID: 25099759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ferric sulfate as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: twenty month clinical follow-up.
    Ibricevic H; al-Jame Q
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 11314410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo evaluation of the treatment outcome of pulpotomy in primary molars using diode laser, formocresol, and ferric sulphate.
    Durmus B; Tanboga I
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2014 May; 32(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 24717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Formocresol, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Portland Cement, and Enamel Matrix Derivative in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: A Two Year Follow-Up.
    Yildirim C; Basak F; Akgun OM; Polat GG; Altun C
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 26696101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic evaluation of Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy on human primary teeth.
    Odabaş ME; Bodur H; Bariş E; Demir C
    J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 17368330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of formocresol versus ferric sulphate primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Peng L; Ye L; Guo X; Tan H; Zhou X; Wang C; Li R
    Int Endod J; 2007 Oct; 40(10):751-7. PubMed ID: 17714467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy of primary teeth: a 2-year follow-up.
    Ansari G; Ranjpour M
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 20518934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.