624 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28792115)
1. Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up.
Papaspyridakos P; Kang K; DeFuria C; Amin S; Kudara Y; Weber HP
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jan; 30(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28792115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with zirconia complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: An up to 4-year retrospective clinical study.
Tischler M; Patch C; Bidra AS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 29559219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrospective 2- to 7-Year Follow-Up Study of 20 Double Full-Arch Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Prostheses: Measurements and Recommendations for Optimal Design.
Rojas Vizcaya F
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):501-508. PubMed ID: 27570943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Full-Mouth Implant Rehabilitation With Monolithic Zirconia: Benefits and Limitations.
Amin S; Weber HP; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2017 Jan; 38(1):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 28054794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prosthetic complications with monolithic or micro-veneered implant-supported zirconia single-unit, multiple-unit, and complete-arch prostheses on titanium base abutments: A single center retrospective study with mean follow-up period of 72.35 months.
Saponaro PC; Karasan D; Donmez MB; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 36321480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital Workflow for Implant Rehabilitation with Double Full-Arch Monolithic Zirconia Prostheses.
Papaspyridakos P; Chochlidakis K; Kang K; Chen YW; Alghfeli A; Kudara Y; Weber HP
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):460-465. PubMed ID: 32185825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screw-retained ceramic-veneered/monolithic zirconia partial implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A 5 to 10-year retrospective study on survival and complications.
Zhang Y; Luo J; Di P; Chen B; Li J; Yu Z; Lin Y
J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 37302066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Full-Contour Crowns Bonded on CAD/CAM Zirconia Complete-Arch Implant Bridges With 3 to 5 Years of Follow-Up.
Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Barlattani A
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Aug; 41(4):450-8. PubMed ID: 24188105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with predominantly monolithic zirconia compared to metal-acrylic prostheses: a 2-year retrospective clinical study.
Cappare P; Ferrini F; Mariani G; Nagni M; Cattoni F
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2021; 35(4 Suppl. 1):99-112. PubMed ID: 34425665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing zirconia implant fixed complete prostheses: clinical results and technical complications up to 4 years of function.
Papaspyridakos P; Lal K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 22413889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual jaw treatment of edentulism using implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses.
Altarawneh S; Limmer B; Reside GJ; Cooper L
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2015; 27(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 25640984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: A 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study.
De Angelis P; Passarelli PC; Gasparini G; Boniello R; D'Amato G; De Angelis S
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):252-256. PubMed ID: 31202552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Metal-Zirconia Implant Fixed Hybrid Full-Arch Prosthesis: An Alternative Technique for Fabrication.
Stumpel LJ; Haechler W
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2018 Mar; 39(3):176-181. PubMed ID: 29493247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival of 2039 complete arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: A retrospective study.
Bidra AS; Tischler M; Patch C
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):220-224. PubMed ID: 28689903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface.
Venezia P; Torsello F; Cavalcanti R; D'Amato S
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 25979446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? A review.
Sadowsky SJ
Dent Mater; 2020 Jan; 36(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31500904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complications and Clinical Considerations of the Implant-Retained Zirconia Complete-Arch Prosthesis with Various Opposing Dentitions.
Gonzalez J; Triplett RG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):864-869. PubMed ID: 28708920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with CAD/CAM-fabricated porcelain crown and zirconia-based framework.
Takaba M; Tanaka S; Ishiura Y; Baba K
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 23289495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcomes of all-ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prostheses supported by ceramic implants: A systematic review and meta-analyses.
Spitznagel FA; Balmer M; Wiedemeier DB; Jung RE; Gierthmuehlen PC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jan; 33(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 34665900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
