These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28792195)

  • 1. Can hydrophilic coated catheters be beneficial for the public healthcare system in Brazil? - A cost-effectiveness analysis in patients with spinal cord injuries.
    Truzzi JC; Teich V; Pepe C
    Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 28792195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Long-Term Intermittent Self-Catheterization with Hydrophilic-Coated and Uncoated Catheters in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury in Japan.
    Watanabe T; Yamamoto S; Gotoh M; Saitoh T; Yokoyama O; Murata T; Takeda M
    Low Urin Tract Symptoms; 2017 Sep; 9(3):142-150. PubMed ID: 28868661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic-coated intermittent catheters compared with uncoated catheters in Canada: a public payer perspective.
    Welk B; Isaranuwatchai W; Krassioukov A; Husted Torp L; Elterman D
    J Med Econ; 2018 Jul; 21(7):639-648. PubMed ID: 29458282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis.
    Bermingham SL; Hodgkinson S; Wright S; Hayter E; Spinks J; Pellowe C
    BMJ; 2013 Jan; 346():e8639. PubMed ID: 23303886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Healthcare resource consumption for intermittent urinary catheterisation: cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic catheters and budget impact analyses.
    Rognoni C; Tarricone R
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e012360. PubMed ID: 28096251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of hydrophilic-coated catheters in long-term intermittent catheter users in the UK.
    Baker H; Avey B; Overbeck Rethmeier L; Mealing S; Lynge Buchter M; Averbeck MA; Thiruchelvam N
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 Feb; 39(2):319-328. PubMed ID: 36444510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hydrophilic catheters for intermittent catheterization and occurrence of urinary tract infections. A retrospective comparative study in patients with spinal cord Injury.
    Ali S; Khan OS; Youssef AM; Saba I; Alfedaih D
    BMC Urol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):122. PubMed ID: 38867233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cost-effectiveness analysis of long-term intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and uncoated catheters.
    Clark JF; Mealing SJ; Scott DA; Vogel LC; Krassioukov A; Spinelli M; Bagi P; Wyndaele JJ
    Spinal Cord; 2016 Jan; 54(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 26193812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic-coated catheters (SpeediCath) reduces the risk of clinical urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomised parallel comparative trial.
    De Ridder DJ; Everaert K; Fernández LG; Valero JV; Durán AB; Abrisqueta ML; Ventura MG; Sotillo AR
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):991-5. PubMed ID: 16137822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intermittent catheterization with a hydrophilic-coated catheter delays urinary tract infections in acute spinal cord injury: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.
    Cardenas DD; Moore KN; Dannels-McClure A; Scelza WM; Graves DE; Brooks M; Busch AK
    PM R; 2011 May; 3(5):408-17. PubMed ID: 21570027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of urinary catheters with silver alloy coating in spinal cord injured patients: trial protocol.
    Bonfill X; Rigau D; Jáuregui-Abrisqueta ML; Barrera Chacón JM; de la Barrera SS; Alemán-Sánchez CM; Bea-Muñoz M; Moraleda Pérez S; Borau Duran A; Espinosa Quirós JR; Ledesma Romano L; Fuertes ME; Araya I; Martínez-Zapata MJ
    BMC Urol; 2013 Jul; 13():38. PubMed ID: 23895463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A scoping review on the impact of hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic intermittent catheters on UTI, QoL, satisfaction, preference, and other outcomes in neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients suffering from urinary retention.
    Barken KB; Vaabengaard R
    BMC Urol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):153. PubMed ID: 36123663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study.
    Sarica S; Akkoc Y; Karapolat H; Aktug H
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2010 Dec; 46(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20445490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy and safety of urinary catheters with silver alloy coating in patients with spinal cord injury: a multicentric pragmatic randomized controlled trial. The ESCALE trial.
    Bonfill X; Rigau D; Esteban-Fuertes M; Barrera-Chacón JM; Jáuregui-Abrisqueta ML; Salvador S; Alemán-Sánchez CM; Borau A; Bea-Muñoz M; Hidalgo B; Andrade MJ; Espinosa JR; Martínez-Zapata MJ;
    Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1650-1657. PubMed ID: 28578163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long-term bladder conditions.
    Prieto JA; Murphy CL; Stewart F; Fader M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Oct; 10(10):CD006008. PubMed ID: 34699062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review.
    Shamout S; Biardeau X; Corcos J; Campeau L
    Spinal Cord; 2017 Jul; 55(7):629-643. PubMed ID: 28117329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intermittent Catheters for Chronic Urinary Retention: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Health Quality Ontario
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(1):1-153. PubMed ID: 30847008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes comparison of hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic catheters for patients with intermittent catheterization: An updated meta-analysis.
    Feng D; Cheng L; Bai Y; Yang Y; Han P
    Asian J Surg; 2020 May; 43(5):633-635. PubMed ID: 31959575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Healthcare Costs Associated with Hydrophilic-Coated And Non-Coated Urinary Catheters for Intermittent Use In the United States.
    Urol Nurs; 2016; 36(5):233-42. PubMed ID: 29240338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized crossover study of silver-coated urinary catheters in hospitalized patients.
    Karchmer TB; Giannetta ET; Muto CA; Strain BA; Farr BM
    Arch Intern Med; 2000 Nov; 160(21):3294-8. PubMed ID: 11088092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.