289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28792889)
1. Uncoupling evolutionary changes in DNA sequence, transcription factor occupancy and enhancer activity.
Khoueiry P; Girardot C; Ciglar L; Peng PC; Gustafson EH; Sinha S; Furlong EE
Elife; 2017 Aug; 6():. PubMed ID: 28792889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of sequence determinants of enhancer function using natural genetic variation.
Yang MG; Ling E; Cowley CJ; Greenberg ME; Vierbuchen T
Elife; 2022 Aug; 11():. PubMed ID: 36043696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Role of Chromatin Accessibility in cis-Regulatory Evolution.
Peng PC; Khoueiry P; Girardot C; Reddington JP; Garfield DA; Furlong EEM; Sinha S
Genome Biol Evol; 2019 Jul; 11(7):1813-1828. PubMed ID: 31114856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short DNA sequence patterns accurately identify broadly active human enhancers.
Colbran LL; Chen L; Capra JA
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 28716036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional tests of enhancer conservation between distantly related species.
Ruvinsky I; Ruvkun G
Development; 2003 Nov; 130(21):5133-42. PubMed ID: 12944426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A machine learning approach for identifying novel cell type-specific transcriptional regulators of myogenesis.
Busser BW; Taher L; Kim Y; Tansey T; Bloom MJ; Ovcharenko I; Michelson AM
PLoS Genet; 2012; 8(3):e1002531. PubMed ID: 22412381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High conservation of transcription factor binding and evidence for combinatorial regulation across six Drosophila species.
He Q; Bardet AF; Patton B; Purvis J; Johnston J; Paulson A; Gogol M; Stark A; Zeitlinger J
Nat Genet; 2011 May; 43(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 21478888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cooperative binding between distant transcription factors is a hallmark of active enhancers.
Rao S; Ahmad K; Ramachandran S
Mol Cell; 2021 Apr; 81(8):1651-1665.e4. PubMed ID: 33705711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative-enhancer-FACS-seq (QeFS) reveals epistatic interactions among motifs within transcriptional enhancers in developing Drosophila tissue.
Waters CT; Gisselbrecht SS; Sytnikova YA; Cafarelli TM; Hill DE; Bulyk ML
Genome Biol; 2021 Dec; 22(1):348. PubMed ID: 34930411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Co-occupancy by multiple cardiac transcription factors identifies transcriptional enhancers active in heart.
He A; Kong SW; Ma Q; Pu WT
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Apr; 108(14):5632-7. PubMed ID: 21415370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transcriptional regulators form diverse groups with context-dependent regulatory functions.
Stampfel G; Kazmar T; Frank O; Wienerroither S; Reiter F; Stark A
Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7580):147-51. PubMed ID: 26550828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cis-regulatory dynamics of the Drosophila CNS determinant castor are controlled by multiple sub-pattern enhancers.
Kuzin A; Kundu M; Ross J; Koizumi K; Brody T; Odenwald WF
Gene Expr Patterns; 2012; 12(7-8):261-72. PubMed ID: 22691242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative genome-wide enhancer activity maps for five Drosophila species show functional enhancer conservation and turnover during cis-regulatory evolution.
Arnold CD; Gerlach D; Spies D; Matts JA; Sytnikova YA; Pagani M; Lau NC; Stark A
Nat Genet; 2014 Jul; 46(7):685-92. PubMed ID: 24908250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Principles of regulatory information conservation between mouse and human.
Cheng Y; Ma Z; Kim BH; Wu W; Cayting P; Boyle AP; Sundaram V; Xing X; Dogan N; Li J; Euskirchen G; Lin S; Lin Y; Visel A; Kawli T; Yang X; Patacsil D; Keller CA; Giardine B; ; Kundaje A; Wang T; Pennacchio LA; Weng Z; Hardison RC; Snyder MP
Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7527):371-375. PubMed ID: 25409826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DeepSTARR predicts enhancer activity from DNA sequence and enables the de novo design of synthetic enhancers.
de Almeida BP; Reiter F; Pagani M; Stark A
Nat Genet; 2022 May; 54(5):613-624. PubMed ID: 35551305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evolution of developmental genes: molecular microevolution of enhancer sequences at the Ubx locus in Drosophila and its impact on developmental phenotypes.
Phinchongsakuldit J; MacArthur S; Brookfield JF
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Feb; 21(2):348-63. PubMed ID: 14660693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Information content differentiates enhancers from silencers in mouse photoreceptors.
Friedman RZ; Granas DM; Myers CA; Corbo JC; Cohen BA; White MA
Elife; 2021 Sep; 10():. PubMed ID: 34486522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissection of thousands of cell type-specific enhancers identifies dinucleotide repeat motifs as general enhancer features.
Yáñez-Cuna JO; Arnold CD; Stampfel G; Boryń LM; Gerlach D; Rath M; Stark A
Genome Res; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1147-56. PubMed ID: 24714811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolutionary mirages: selection on binding site composition creates the illusion of conserved grammars in Drosophila enhancers.
Lusk RW; Eisen MB
PLoS Genet; 2010 Jan; 6(1):e1000829. PubMed ID: 20107516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uncovering cis-regulatory sequence requirements for context-specific transcription factor binding.
Yáñez-Cuna JO; Dinh HQ; Kvon EZ; Shlyueva D; Stark A
Genome Res; 2012 Oct; 22(10):2018-30. PubMed ID: 22534400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
