BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

549 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28792971)

  • 1. Optimized detection of insertions/deletions (INDELs) in whole-exome sequencing data.
    Kim BY; Park JH; Jo HY; Koo SK; Park MH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182272. PubMed ID: 28792971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance evaluation of indel calling tools using real short-read data.
    Hasan MS; Wu X; Zhang L
    Hum Genomics; 2015 Aug; 9(1):20. PubMed ID: 26286629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. INDELseek: detection of complex insertions and deletions from next-generation sequencing data.
    Au CH; Leung AY; Kwong A; Chan TL; Ma ES
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28056804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. mInDel: a high-throughput and efficient pipeline for genome-wide InDel marker development.
    Lv Y; Liu Y; Zhao H
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Apr; 17():290. PubMed ID: 27079510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of insertion/deletion calling algorithms on human next-generation sequencing data.
    Ghoneim DH; Myers JR; Tuttle E; Paciorkowski AR
    BMC Res Notes; 2014 Dec; 7():864. PubMed ID: 25435282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of INDEL Calling Tools with Simulation Data and Real Short-Read Data.
    Li D; Kim W; Wang L; Yoon KA; Park B; Park C; Kong SY; Hwang Y; Baek D; Lee ES; Won S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(5):1635-1644. PubMed ID: 30004886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing INDEL calling errors in whole genome and exome sequencing data.
    Fang H; Wu Y; Narzisi G; O'Rawe JA; Barrón LT; Rosenbaum J; Ronemus M; Iossifov I; Schatz MC; Lyon GJ
    Genome Med; 2014; 6(10):89. PubMed ID: 25426171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
    Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study on fast calling variants from next-generation sequencing data using decision tree.
    Li Z; Wang Y; Wang F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 29673316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation and optimisation of indel detection workflows for ion torrent sequencing of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
    Yeo ZX; Wong JC; Rozen SG; Lee AS
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):516. PubMed ID: 24962530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amplicon Indel Hunter Is a Novel Bioinformatics Tool to Detect Large Somatic Insertion/Deletion Mutations in Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
    Kadri S; Zhen CJ; Wurst MN; Long BC; Jiang ZF; Wang YL; Furtado LV; Segal JP
    J Mol Diagn; 2015 Nov; 17(6):635-43. PubMed ID: 26319364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance assessment of variant calling pipelines using human whole exome sequencing and simulated data.
    Kumaran M; Subramanian U; Devarajan B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):342. PubMed ID: 31208315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison and evaluation of two exome capture kits and sequencing platforms for variant calling.
    Zhang G; Wang J; Yang J; Li W; Deng Y; Li J; Huang J; Hu S; Zhang B
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):581. PubMed ID: 26242175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The challenge of detecting indels in bacterial genomes from short-read sequencing data.
    Steglich M; Nübel U
    J Biotechnol; 2017 May; 250():11-15. PubMed ID: 28267569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of genome-wide insertion and deletion markers for maize, based on next-generation sequencing data.
    Liu J; Qu J; Yang C; Tang D; Li J; Lan H; Rong T
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):601. PubMed ID: 26269146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dindel: accurate indel calls from short-read data.
    Albers CA; Lunter G; MacArthur DG; McVean G; Ouwehand WH; Durbin R
    Genome Res; 2011 Jun; 21(6):961-73. PubMed ID: 20980555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From Wet-Lab to Variations: Concordance and Speed of Bioinformatics Pipelines for Whole Genome and Whole Exome Sequencing.
    Laurie S; Fernandez-Callejo M; Marco-Sola S; Trotta JR; Camps J; Chacón A; Espinosa A; Gut M; Gut I; Heath S; Beltran S
    Hum Mutat; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1263-1271. PubMed ID: 27604516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A universal algorithm for de novo decrypting of heterozygous indel sequences: a tool for personalized medicine.
    Lam CW
    Clin Chim Acta; 2008 Mar; 389(1-2):7-13. PubMed ID: 18078814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparison of Variant Calling Pipelines Using Genome in a Bottle as a Reference.
    Cornish A; Guda C
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():456479. PubMed ID: 26539496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
    Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B
    BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.