491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28793847)
1. Effects of electrode deactivation on speech recognition in multichannel cochlear implant recipients.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Nov; 18(6):324-334. PubMed ID: 28793847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise, and Health Related Quality of Life.
Sladen DP; Carlson ML; Dowling BP; Olund AP; DeJong MD; Breneman A; Hollander S; Beatty CW; Neff BA; Driscoll CL
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 29683995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech Recognition as a Function of Age and Listening Experience in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Murr AT; Canfarotta MW; O'Connell BP; Buss E; King ER; Bucker AL; Dillon SA; Rooth MA; Dedmon MM; Brown KD; Dillon MT
Laryngoscope; 2021 Sep; 131(9):2106-2111. PubMed ID: 34043247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
Zeng FG; Galvin JJ
Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV; Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3586-96. PubMed ID: 9857517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early Sentence Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
James CJ; Karoui C; Laborde ML; Lepage B; Molinier CÉ; Tartayre M; Escudé B; Deguine O; Marx M; Fraysse B
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30335668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels.
Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Nov; 120(5 Pt 1):2908-25. PubMed ID: 17139748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
Vandali AE; Dawson PW; Arora K
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual Differences in Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implantation.
Dornhoffer JR; Reddy P; Meyer TA; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Dubno JR; McRackan TR
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):280-286. PubMed ID: 33410869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of site-specific level adjustments on speech recognition with cochlear implants.
Zhou N; Pfingst BE
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 24225651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beyond Sentence Recognition in Quiet for Older Adults: Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
Zhang E; Coelho DH
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):979-986. PubMed ID: 29912832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conversion of adult Nucleus® 5 cochlear implant users to the Nucleus® 6 system.
De Ceulaer G; Swinnen F; Pascoal D; Philips B; Killian M; James C; Govaerts PJ; Dhooge I
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jul; 16(4):222-32. PubMed ID: 25284643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
