BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28794215)

  • 1. Male relatedness and familiarity are required to modulate male-induced harm to females in
    Le Page S; Sepil I; Flintham E; Pizzari T; Carazo P; Wigby S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Aug; 284(1860):. PubMed ID: 28794215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are flies kind to kin? The role of intra- and inter-sexual relatedness in mediating reproductive conflict.
    Martin ES; Long TA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Dec; 282(1821):20151991. PubMed ID: 26674954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No evidence that relatedness or familiarity modulates male harm in
    Marquez-Rosado A; Garcia-Co C; Londoño-Nieto C; Carazo P
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Apr; 12(4):e8803. PubMed ID: 35432938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Males harm females less when competing with familiar relatives.
    Lymbery SJ; Simmons LW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Nov; 284(1867):. PubMed ID: 29142115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Within-group male relatedness reduces harm to females in Drosophila.
    Carazo P; Tan CK; Allen F; Wigby S; Pizzari T
    Nature; 2014 Jan; 505(7485):672-5. PubMed ID: 24463521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does kin selection moderate sexual conflict in Drosophila?
    Chippindale AK; Berggren M; Alpern JH; Montgomerie R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 282(1813):20151417. PubMed ID: 26269501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No evidence that within-group male relatedness reduces harm to females in Drosophila.
    Hollis B; Kawecki TJ; Keller L
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Feb; 5(4):979-83. PubMed ID: 25750723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Related male Drosophila melanogaster reared together as larvae fight less and sire longer lived daughters.
    Carazo P; Perry JC; Johnson F; Pizzari T; Wigby S
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Jul; 5(14):2787-97. PubMed ID: 26306167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assortative mating for relatedness in a large naturally occurring population of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Robinson SP; Kennington WJ; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Apr; 25(4):716-25. PubMed ID: 22321157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Kin but less than kind: within-group male relatedness does not increase female fitness in seed beetles.
    Berg EC; Lind MI; Monahan S; Bricout S; Maklakov AA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Sep; 286(1910):20191664. PubMed ID: 31506055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thermal phenotypic plasticity of pre- and post-copulatory male harm buffers sexual conflict in wild
    Londoño-Nieto C; García-Roa R; Garcia-Co C; González P; Carazo P
    Elife; 2023 Apr; 12():. PubMed ID: 37102499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Pitnick S; García-González F
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Sep; 269(1502):1821-8. PubMed ID: 12350270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No evidence for divergence in male harmfulness or female resistance in response to changes in the opportunity for dispersal.
    Lymbery SJ; Wyber B; Tomkins JL; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Jul; 33(7):966-978. PubMed ID: 32279381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict.
    Wigby S; Chapman T
    Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):1028-37. PubMed ID: 15212383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic variation in male-induced harm in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Filice DC; Long TA
    Biol Lett; 2016 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 27122010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Condition-dependent interaction between mating success and competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.
    De Nardo AN; Roy J; Sbilordo SH; Lüpold S
    Evolution; 2021 Aug; 75(8):2014-2026. PubMed ID: 33834478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males.
    Linder JE; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):568-75. PubMed ID: 15842486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution of mate-harm, longevity and behaviour in male fruit flies subjected to different levels of interlocus conflict.
    Nandy B; Gupta V; Sen S; Udaykumar N; Samant MA; Ali SZ; Prasad NG
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Sep; 13():212. PubMed ID: 24073883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproductive advantage of the winners of male-male competition in Drosophila prolongata.
    Amino K; Matsuo T
    Behav Processes; 2023 Mar; 206():104831. PubMed ID: 36693576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The benefits of male ejaculate sex peptide transfer in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Fricke C; Wigby S; Hobbs R; Chapman T
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 19032499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.