These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28794842)

  • 1. Mega Acer Kit® is more effective for warming the intravenous fluid than Ranger™ and ThermoSens® at 440 ml/h of infusion rate: an experimental performance study.
    Kim DJ; Kim SH; So KY; An TH
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2017 Aug; 70(4):456-461. PubMed ID: 28794842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental comparison of performances of Mega Acer Kit, Ranger and ThermoSens according to flow rates and distances.
    Seo HJ; Kim SH; An TH; Kim DJ
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Dec; 32(6):1127-1134. PubMed ID: 28176049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery.
    Jung KT; Kim SH; So KY; So HJ; Shim SB
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2015 Oct; 68(5):462-8. PubMed ID: 26495056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Warming efficacy of Ranger™ and FT2800 fluid warmer under different room temperatures and flow rates.
    Xu X; Lian C; Liu Y; Ding H; Lu Y; ShangGuan W
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Oct; 34(5):1105-1110. PubMed ID: 31624997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Heating capabilities of small fluid warming systems.
    Zoremba N; Bruells C; Rossaint R; Breuer T
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 30055566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The comparative effectiveness of different infusion and blood warming methods].
    Schmidt JH; Weyland W; Fritz U; Bräuer A; Rathgeber J; Braun U
    Anaesthesist; 1996 Nov; 45(11):1067-74. PubMed ID: 9012302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of a new heated and humidified breathing circuit with a fluid-warming device on intraoperative core temperature: a prospective randomized study.
    Kim E; Lee SY; Lim YJ; Choi JY; Jeon YT; Hwang JW; Park HP
    J Anesth; 2015 Aug; 29(4):499-507. PubMed ID: 25771760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The laboratory performance of the enFLOW(®) , buddy lite(™) and ThermoSens(®) fluid warmers.
    Kim HJ; Yoo SM; Jung JS; Lee SH; Sun K; Son HS
    Anaesthesia; 2015 Feb; 70(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 25388624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro evaluation of three intravenous fluid line warmers.
    Lee RA; Towle Millard HA; Weil AB; Lantz G; Constable P; Lescun TB; Weng HY
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2014 Jun; 244(12):1423-8. PubMed ID: 24871065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of four techniques of warming intravenous fluids.
    Ohtsuka N; Yamakage M; Chen X; Kamada Y; Namiki A
    J Anesth; 2002; 16(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 14517666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Heating capabilities of fluid warming systems during low infusion rates].
    Schnoor J; Simon HB; Schälte G; Weber I; Rossaint R
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2004 Aug; 39(8):477-81. PubMed ID: 15319842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A laboratory comparison of the performance of the buddy lite™ and enFlow™ fluid warmers.
    Bruells CS; Bruells AC; Rossaint R; Stoppe C; Schaelte G; Zoremba N
    Anaesthesia; 2013 Nov; 68(11):1161-4. PubMed ID: 24111603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of three systems for warming intravenous fluids at different flow rates.
    Satoh J; Yamakage M; Wasaki SI; Namiki A
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2006 Feb; 34(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 16494149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Warming efficacy and blood damaging of blood and infusion warmers].
    Moerer O; Bräuer A; Weyland W; Braun U
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2004 Mar; 39(3):138-46. PubMed ID: 15042503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heating capabilities of the Hotline and Autoline at low flow rates.
    Schnoor J; Weber I; Macko S; Heussen N; Rossaint R
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2006 Apr; 16(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 16618295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Verification of an intravenous fluid warmer: A prospective, two-center observational trial.
    Lax M; Mustola ST; Repo K; Järvinen J; Bayoro DK; Cataldo SH; Karhinen V; Rose EA; Groepenhoff H; Waldmann AD
    SAGE Open Med; 2023; 11():20503121231182517. PubMed ID: 37576564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of warming and flow rate conditions of blood warmers on red blood cell integrity.
    Poder TG; Pruneau D; Dorval J; Thibault L; Fisette JF; Bédard SK; Jacques A; Beauregard P
    Vox Sang; 2016 Nov; 111(4):341-349. PubMed ID: 27280338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a new fluid warmer effective at low to moderate flow rates.
    Presson RG; Bezruczko AP; Hillier SC; McNiece WL
    Anesthesiology; 1993 May; 78(5):974-80. PubMed ID: 8489069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flow rates and warming efficacy with Hotline and Ranger blood/fluid warmers.
    Horowitz PE; Delagarza MA; Pulaski JJ; Smith RA
    Anesth Analg; 2004 Sep; 99(3):788-792. PubMed ID: 15333412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective methods of in-line intravenous fluid warming at low to moderate infusion rates.
    Bostek CC
    AANA J; 1992 Dec; 60(6):561-6. PubMed ID: 1292322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.