63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28795282)
1. A novel micromorphic approach captures non-locality in continuum bone remodelling.
Titlbach A; Papastavrou A; McBride A; Steinmann P
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024 Jun; 27(8):1042-1055. PubMed ID: 37318076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An improved trabecular bone model based on Voronoi tessellation.
Zhou Y; Isaksson P; Persson C
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Dec; 148():106172. PubMed ID: 37852087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A computational continuum model of poroelastic beds.
Lācis U; Zampogna GA; Bagheri S
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2017 Mar; 473(2199):20160932. PubMed ID: 28413355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mesoscale simulations: An indispensable approach to understand biomembranes.
Duncan AL; Pezeshkian W
Biophys J; 2023 Jun; 122(11):1883-1889. PubMed ID: 36809878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of a change in activity regime on femoral bone architecture and failure behaviour.
Villette CC; Phillips ATM
PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0297932. PubMed ID: 38683797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical bone adaptation response is region specific, but not peak load dependent: insights from
Miller CJ; Pickering E; Martelli S; Dall'Ara E; Delisser P; Pivonka P
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2024 Feb; 23(1):287-304. PubMed ID: 37851203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finite element analysis of bone remodelling with piezoelectric effects using an open-source framework.
Bansod YD; Kebbach M; Kluess D; Bader R; van Rienen U
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Jun; 20(3):1147-1166. PubMed ID: 33740158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.
de Alcântara ACS; Assis I; Prada D; Mehle K; Schwan S; Costa-Paiva L; Skaf MS; Wrobel LC; Sollero P
Materials (Basel); 2019 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 31878356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel algorithm to predict bone changes in the mouse tibia properties under physiological conditions.
Cheong VS; Campos Marin A; Lacroix D; Dall'Ara E
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Jun; 19(3):985-1001. PubMed ID: 31786678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Orthotropic bone remodelling around uncemented femoral implant: a comparison with isotropic formulation.
Mathai B; Dhara S; Gupta S
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Jun; 20(3):1115-1134. PubMed ID: 33768358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. If bone is the answer, then what is the question?
Huiskes R
J Anat; 2000 Aug; 197 ( Pt 2)(Pt 2):145-56. PubMed ID: 11005707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biological basis of bone strength: anatomy, physiology and measurement.
Hart NH; Newton RU; Tan J; Rantalainen T; Chivers P; Siafarikas A; Nimphius S
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2020 Sep; 20(3):347-371. PubMed ID: 32877972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microscale poroelastic metamodel for efficient mesoscale bone remodelling simulations.
Villette CC; Phillips ATM
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Dec; 16(6):2077-2091. PubMed ID: 28795282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Informing phenomenological structural bone remodelling with a mechanistic poroelastic model.
Villette CC; Phillips AT
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Feb; 15(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 26534771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in the fabric and compliance tensors of cancellous bone due to trabecular surface remodeling, predicted by a digital image-based model.
Tsubota K; Adachi T
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Aug; 7(4):187-92. PubMed ID: 15512762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
