These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28795612)

  • 1. Anticipating health innovations in 2030-2040: Where does responsibility lie for the publics?
    Lehoux P; Miller FA; Grimard D; Gauthier P
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Apr; 27(3):276-293. PubMed ID: 28795612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of a multimedia-based prospective method to support public deliberations on health technology design: participant survey findings and qualitative insights.
    Lehoux P; Jimenez-Pernett J; Miller FA; Williams-Jones B
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Oct; 16(1):616. PubMed ID: 27784317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Steering vaccinomics innovations with anticipatory governance and participatory foresight.
    Ozdemir V; Faraj SA; Knoppers BM
    OMICS; 2011 Sep; 15(9):637-46. PubMed ID: 21848419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining the ethical and social issues of health technology design through the public appraisal of prospective scenarios: a study protocol describing a multimedia-based deliberative method.
    Lehoux P; Gauthier P; Williams-Jones B; Miller FA; Fishman JR; Hivon M; Vachon P
    Implement Sci; 2014 Jun; 9():81. PubMed ID: 24952582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.
    Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24434712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An overview of the role of society and risk in xenotransplantation.
    Sobbrio P; Jorqui M
    Xenotransplantation; 2014; 21(6):523-32. PubMed ID: 25040770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Art for public engagement on emerging and controversial technologies: A literature review.
    Fraaije A; van der Meij MG; Kupper F; Broerse JEW
    Public Underst Sci; 2022 Aug; 31(6):694-710. PubMed ID: 35570661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ecological validity and the study of publics: The case for organic public engagement methods.
    Gehrke PJ
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 23887250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New surveillance technologies and their publics: A case of biometrics.
    Martin AK; Donovan KP
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Oct; 24(7):842-57. PubMed ID: 24510921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward a manifesto for the 'public understanding of big data'.
    Michael M; Lupton D
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):104-16. PubMed ID: 26468128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technoscience, imagined publics and public imaginations.
    Rommetveit K; Wynne B
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Feb; 26(2):133-147. PubMed ID: 28168940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.
    Degeling C; Carter SM; Rychetnik L
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Apr; 131():114-21. PubMed ID: 25770463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Avoiding empty rhetoric: engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies.
    Kyle R; Dodds S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2009 Mar; 15(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 18825510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The social aspects of genome editing: publics as stakeholders, populations and participants in animal research.
    Davies G; Gorman R; McGlacken R; Peres S
    Lab Anim; 2022 Feb; 56(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 33596730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Engaging with the political imaginaries of science: Near misses and future targets.
    Nowotny H
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 24434706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Public bioethics and public engagement: the politics of "proper talk".
    Moore A
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Mar; 19(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 20533798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing ethical standards for responsible research: Why? Form? Functions? Process? Outcomes?
    Frankel MS
    J Dent Res; 1996 Feb; 75(2):832-5. PubMed ID: 8655783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond public perceptions of gene technology: community participation in public policy in Australia.
    Dietrich H; Schibeci R
    Public Underst Sci; 2003 Oct; 12(4):381-401. PubMed ID: 14971401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.