These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28795835)

  • 1. Explicit goal-driven attention, unlike implicitly learned attention, spreads to secondary tasks.
    Addleman DA; Tao J; Remington RW; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):356-366. PubMed ID: 28795835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of goal-driven attention on the acquisition of location probability learning.
    Holtz EC; Lee VG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jun; 50(6):845-857. PubMed ID: 37956040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Habitual versus goal-driven attention.
    Jiang YV
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():107-120. PubMed ID: 28734549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicit location probability learning does not induce baseline shifts of visuospatial attention.
    Addleman DA; Schmidt AL; Remington RW; Jiang YV
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):552-558. PubMed ID: 30887446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acquisition of habitual visual attention and transfer to related tasks.
    Salovich NA; Remington RW; Jiang YV
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1052-1058. PubMed ID: 28698989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Explicit attentional goals unlock implicit spatial statistical learning.
    Zhang Z; Carlisle NB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Aug; 152(8):2125-2137. PubMed ID: 37053400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention.
    Won BY; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):787-806. PubMed ID: 25401460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Egocentric coding of space for incidentally learned attention: effects of scene context and task instructions.
    Jiang YV; Swallow KM; Sun L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):233-50. PubMed ID: 23937234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modulation of spatial attention by goals, statistical learning, and monetary reward.
    Jiang YV; Sha LZ; Remington RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2189-206. PubMed ID: 26105657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing.
    Jiang YV; Swallow KM; Won BY; Cistera JD; Rosenbaum GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):50-66. PubMed ID: 25113853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression.
    Britton MK; Anderson BA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):324-334. PubMed ID: 31886698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probabilistic cuing of visual search: Neither implicit nor inflexible.
    Giménez-Fernández T; Luque D; Shanks DR; Vadillo MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1222-1234. PubMed ID: 32757593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulations of saliency signals at two hierarchical levels of priority computation revealed by spatial statistical distractor learning.
    Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Apr; 150(4):710-728. PubMed ID: 33048567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Both memory and attention systems contribute to visual search for targets cued by implicitly learned context.
    Giesbrecht B; Sy JL; Guerin SA
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 85():80-9. PubMed ID: 23099047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A spatial bias toward highly rewarded locations is associated with awareness.
    Sisk CA; Remington RW; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):669-683. PubMed ID: 31343251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of spatial congruency on saccade and visual discrimination performance in a dual-task paradigm.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():100-11. PubMed ID: 25449339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing": Retraction.
    Jiang YV; Swallow KM; Rosenbaum GM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jul; 48(7):782. PubMed ID: 35679190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Habitual attention in older and young adults.
    Jiang YV; Koutstaal W; Twedell EL
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Dec; 31(8):970-980. PubMed ID: 27831723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of spatial and feature probability cuing in visual search.
    Schwark J; Dolgov I
    Perception; 2013; 42(4):470-2. PubMed ID: 23866559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.
    Chun MM; Jiang Y
    Cogn Psychol; 1998 Jun; 36(1):28-71. PubMed ID: 9679076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.