These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1012 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28795845)

  • 1. Analysis of embryo intactness and developmental potential following slow freezing and vitrification.
    Yu L; Jia C; Lan Y; Song R; Zhou L; Li Y; Liang Y; Wang S
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2017 Oct; 63(5):285-293. PubMed ID: 28795845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
    Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
    Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of day 3 embryo morphometrics and morphokinetics on survival and implantation after slow freezing-thawing and after vitrification-warming: a retrospective cohort study.
    Fernandez Gallardo E; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe T; Debrock S
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 Oct; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 28974230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
    Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.
    Wirleitner B; Schuff M; Stecher A; Murtinger M; Vanderzwalmen P
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1685-95. PubMed ID: 27270972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation.
    Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Levi-Setti PE; Soscia D; Orlando G; Albani E; Parini V; Stoppa M; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Ievoli E; Maggiulli R; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 30265329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Outcome of embryo vitrification compared to slow freezing process at early cleavage stages. Report of the first French birth].
    Sifer C; Sermondade N; Dupont C; Poncelet C; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Benzacken B; Levy R
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar; 40(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22154672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cryopreservation of day 2-3 embryos by vitrification yields better outcome than slow freezing.
    Levron J; Leibovitz O; Brengauz M; Gitman H; Yerushalmi GM; Katorza E; Gat I; Elizur SE
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2014 Mar; 30(3):202-4. PubMed ID: 24397397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Slow freezing should not be totally substituted by vitrification when applied to day 3 embryo cryopreservation: an analysis of 5613 frozen cycles.
    Zhu HY; Xue YM; Yang LY; Jiang LY; Ling C; Tong XM; Zhang SY
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Sep; 32(9):1371-7. PubMed ID: 26238389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.
    Rienzi L; Gracia C; Maggiulli R; LaBarbera AR; Kaser DJ; Ubaldi FM; Vanderpoel S; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Mar; 23(2):139-155. PubMed ID: 27827818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cryopreservation method affects DNA fragmentation in trophectoderm and the speed of re-expansion in bovine blastocysts.
    Inaba Y; Miyashita S; Somfai T; Geshi M; Matoba S; Dochi O; Nagai T
    Cryobiology; 2016 Apr; 72(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 26996887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vitrification of ICSI- and IVF-derived bovine blastocysts by minimum volume cooling procedure: effect of developmental stage and age.
    Abdalla H; Shimoda M; Hara H; Morita H; Kuwayama M; Hirabayashi M; Hochi S
    Theriogenology; 2010 Oct; 74(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 20580073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of embryo morphology and morphometrics on implantation of vitrified day 3 embryos after warming: a retrospective cohort study.
    Fernandez Gallardo E; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe T; Debrock S
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2016 Jul; 14(1):40. PubMed ID: 27475526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes diminishes embryo development potential before but not after embryo genomic activation.
    Sun Y; Gu R; Lu X; Zhao S; Feng Y
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Feb; 33(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 26685678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developmental kinetics of in vitro-produced bovine embryos: An aid for making decisions.
    Carrocera S; Caamaño JN; Trigal B; Martín D; Díez C
    Theriogenology; 2016 Mar; 85(5):822-827. PubMed ID: 26607875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of frozen embryo transfer outcomes at blastocyst stage according to freezing method and type of endometrial preparation].
    Pouget O; Scalici E; Hoa-Ferrieres A; Deutsch-Bringer S; Gala A; Dechaud H; Hamamah S
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 25708846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach?
    Tannus S; Cohen Y; Henderson S; Al Ma'mari N; Shavit T; Son WY; Dahan MH
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 30517719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Contribution of embryo vitrification procedure to ART efficiency].
    Sifer C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Oct; 42(10):721-4. PubMed ID: 25192924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The freezing method of cleavage stage embryos has no impact on the weight of the newborns.
    Kaartinen N; Kananen K; Huhtala H; Keränen S; Tinkanen H
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Mar; 33(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 26749388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 51.