These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

535 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28796016)

  • 21. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.
    Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study.
    Mamidanna R; Bottle A; Aylin P; Faiz O; Hanna GB
    Ann Surg; 2012 Feb; 255(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 22173202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
    Yerokun BA; Sun Z; Yang CJ; Gulack BC; Speicher PJ; Adam MA; D'Amico TA; Onaitis MW; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Hartwig MG
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 102(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 27157326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Noble F; Kelly JJ; Bailey IS; Byrne JP; Underwood TJ;
    Dis Esophagus; 2013 Apr; 26(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 23551569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing Perioperative Mortality and Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Analysis.
    Sakamoto T; Fujiogi M; Matsui H; Fushimi K; Yasunaga H
    Ann Surg; 2021 Aug; 274(2):324-330. PubMed ID: 31356263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
    Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
    van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Liu CY; Lin CS; Shih CS; Huang YA; Liu CC; Cheng CT
    World J Surg; 2018 Aug; 42(8):2522-2529. PubMed ID: 29380008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Sugimura K; Miyata H; Kanemura T; Takeoka T; Sugase T; Masuzawa T; Katsuyama S; Motoori M; Takeda Y; Murata K; Yano M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 36749557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?
    Dapri G; Himpens J; Cadière GB
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Apr; 22(4):1060-9. PubMed ID: 18071806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Is Associated with Superior Survival Compared to Open Surgery.
    Ising MS; Smith SA; Trivedi JR; Martin RCG; Phillips P; Van Berkel V; Fox MP
    Am Surg; 2023 May; 89(5):1833-1843. PubMed ID: 35317621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.
    Sihag S; Kosinski AS; Gaissert HA; Wright CD; Schipper PH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. PubMed ID: 26704412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Transthoracic approach is associated with increased incidence of atrial fibrillation after esophageal resection.
    Lohani KR; Nandipati KC; Rollins SE; Fetten K; Lee TH; Pallati PK; Yamamoto SR; Mittal SK
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Jul; 29(7):2039-45. PubMed ID: 25361647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment and comparison of recovery after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: an exploratory study in two centers.
    Parameswaran R; Titcomb DR; Blencowe NS; Berrisford RG; Wajed SA; Streets CG; Hollowood AD; Krysztopik R; Barham CP; Blazeby JM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):1970-7. PubMed ID: 23306956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies.
    Espinoza-Mercado F; Imai TA; Borgella JD; Sarkissian A; Serna-Gallegos D; Alban RF; Soukiasian HJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 30312615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-the eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study.
    Luketich JD; Pennathur A; Franchetti Y; Catalano PJ; Swanson S; Sugarbaker DJ; De Hoyos A; Maddaus MA; Nguyen NT; Benson AB; Fernando HC
    Ann Surg; 2015 Apr; 261(4):702-7. PubMed ID: 25575253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study.
    Schoppmann SF; Prager G; Langer FB; Riegler FM; Kabon B; Fleischmann E; Zacherl J
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Dec; 24(12):3044-53. PubMed ID: 20464423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.