280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28796087)
1. Hearing Preservation During Cochlear Implantation and Electroacoustic Stimulation in Patients With SLC26A4 Mutations.
Roh KJ; Park S; Jung JS; Moon IS; Kim SH; Bang MY; Choi JY
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):1262-1267. PubMed ID: 28796087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes and Predictive Factors of Electroacoustic Stimulation Rehabilitation in Children With Limited Low-Frequency Hearing.
Nam GS; Song MH; Choi JY; Jung J
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Oct; 40(9):e894-e900. PubMed ID: 31498289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cochlear implantation and hearing preservation: Results in 21 consecutively operated patients using the round window approach.
Erixon E; Köbler S; Rask-Andersen H
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 22667762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extremely discrepant mutation spectrum of SLC26A4 between Chinese patients with isolated Mondini deformity and enlarged vestibular aqueduct.
Huang S; Han D; Yuan Y; Wang G; Kang D; Zhang X; Yan X; Meng X; Dong M; Dai P
J Transl Med; 2011 Sep; 9():167. PubMed ID: 21961810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct (EVA) Syndrome.
Manzoor NF; Wick CC; Wahba M; Gupta A; Piper R; Murray GS; Otteson T; Megerian CA; Semaan MT
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e96-103. PubMed ID: 26756161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation.
James CJ; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Lenarz T; Mawman D; Ramos A; Ramsden R; Sterkers O
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():57-62. PubMed ID: 17063012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cochleostomy versus round window insertions: influence on functional outcomes in electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system.
Adunka OF; Dillon MT; Adunka MC; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 24557034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing preservation and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) surgeries.
Usami S; Moteki H; Tsukada K; Miyagawa M; Nishio SY; Takumi Y; Iwasaki S; Kumakawa K; Naito Y; Takahashi H; Kanda Y; Tono T
Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):717-27. PubMed ID: 24834939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acceptance and Benefit of Electroacoustic Stimulation in Children.
Spitzer ER; Kay-Rivest E; Waltzman SB; O'Brien-Russo CA; Santacatterina M; Roland JT; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun; 44(5):453-461. PubMed ID: 37167445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acceptance and Benefits of Electro-Acoustic Stimulation for Conventional-Length Electrode Arrays.
Spitzer ER; Waltzman SB; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 32721977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Helbig S; Adel Y; Rader T; Stöver T; Baumann U
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e353-9. PubMed ID: 27631659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear bone malformations with posterior labyrinth involvement: an exploratory study.
Palomeque Vera JM; Platero Sánchez-Escribano M; Gómez Hervás J; Fernández Prada M; González Ramírez AR; Sainz Quevedo M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 273(4):893-8. PubMed ID: 25971996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enlarged vestibular aqueduct: Audiological and genetical features in children and adolescents.
Aimoni C; Ciorba A; Cerritelli L; Ceruti S; Skarżyński PH; Hatzopoulos S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():254-258. PubMed ID: 28780189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation.
Guimarães AC; Carvalho GM; Duarte AS; Bianchini WA; Sarasty AB; Gregorio MF; Zernotti ME; Sartorato EL; Castilho AM
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 25649137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
