These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28796637)

  • 1. The use of error and uncertainty methods in the medical laboratory.
    Oosterhuis WP; Bayat H; Armbruster D; Coskun A; Freeman KP; Kallner A; Koch D; Mackenzie F; Migliarino G; Orth M; Sandberg S; Sylte MS; Westgard S; Theodorsson E
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2018 Jan; 56(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 28796637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Managing quality vs. measuring uncertainty in the medical laboratory.
    Westgard JO
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010; 48(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 19919330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring Analytical Quality: Total Analytical Error Versus Measurement Uncertainty.
    Westgard JO; Westgard SA
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 28153359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Setting quality specifications for the future with newer approaches to defining uncertainty in laboratory medicine.
    Dybkaer R
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):579-83. PubMed ID: 10667703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extra-analytical sources of uncertainty: which ones really matter?
    Padoan A; Sciacovelli L; Zhou R; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Sep; 57(10):1488-1493. PubMed ID: 31120858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Irregular analytical errors in diagnostic testing - a novel concept.
    Vogeser M; Seger C
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2018 Feb; 56(3):386-396. PubMed ID: 28902615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total error vs. measurement uncertainty: revolution or evolution?
    Oosterhuis WP; Theodorsson E
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 54(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 26540227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainty in Measurement and Total Error: Tools for Coping with Diagnostic Uncertainty.
    Theodorsson E
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 28153362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing.
    Lippi G; Guidi GC; Mattiuzzi C; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(4):358-65. PubMed ID: 16599826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strategies to define performance specifications in laboratory medicine: 3 years on from the Milan Strategic Conference.
    Panteghini M; Ceriotti F; Jones G; Oosterhuis W; Plebani M; Sandberg S;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Oct; 55(12):1849-1856. PubMed ID: 29031018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine?
    Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 16729864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rhetoric Versus Reality? Laboratory Surveys Show Actual Practice Differs Considerably from Proposed Models and Mandated Calculations.
    Westgard SA
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 28153368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias in analytical chemistry: A review of selected procedures for incorporating uncorrected bias into the expanded uncertainty of analytical measurements and a graphical method for evaluating the concordance of reference and test procedures.
    Frenkel R; Farrance I; Badrick T
    Clin Chim Acta; 2019 Aug; 495():129-138. PubMed ID: 30935874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and use of analytical quality specifications in the in vitro diagnostics medical device industry.
    Powers DM; Greenberg N
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):539-43. PubMed ID: 10667695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critique of the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement method of estimating and reporting uncertainty in diagnostic assays.
    Krouwer JS
    Clin Chem; 2003 Nov; 49(11):1818-21. PubMed ID: 14578312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Defining permissible limits for the combined uncertainty budget in the implementation of metrological traceability.
    Braga F; Panteghini M
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Jul; 57():7-11. PubMed ID: 29526674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analytical performance specifications for external quality assessment - definitions and descriptions.
    Jones GRD; Albarede S; Kesseler D; MacKenzie F; Mammen J; Pedersen M; Stavelin A; Thelen M; Thomas A; Twomey PJ; Ventura E; Panteghini M;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Jun; 55(7):949-955. PubMed ID: 28593915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Issues in assessing analytical performance specifications in healthcare systems assembling multiple laboratories and measuring systems.
    Theodorsson E
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2024 Jul; 62(8):1520-1530. PubMed ID: 38329003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using analytical performance specifications in a medical laboratory.
    Jones GRD
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2024 Jul; 62(8):1512-1519. PubMed ID: 38624006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The top-down approach to measurement uncertainty: which formula should we use in laboratory medicine?
    Martinello F; Snoj N; Skitek M; Jerin A
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2020 Jun; 30(2):020101. PubMed ID: 32292278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.