2470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28796882)
41. [Evaluation of gene chip technology for high risk type human papillomavirus in cervical cancer screening].
Li RZ; Shi JF; Zhou QZ; Wu RF; Li N; Wu LN; Zhou YQ; Wang Q; Liu ZH; Liu B; Qiao YL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 86(5):307-11. PubMed ID: 16677522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of HPV-based assays with Papanicolaou smears for cervical cancer screening in Morelos State, Mexico.
Salmerón J; Lazcano-Ponce E; Lorincz A; Hernández M; Hernández P; Leyva A; Uribe M; Manzanares H; Antunez A; Carmona E; Ronnett BM; Sherman ME; Bishai D; Ferris D; Flores Y; Yunes E; Shah KV
Cancer Causes Control; 2003 Aug; 14(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 12948281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Long term results of follow-up after HPV self-sampling with devices Qvintip and HerSwab in women non-attending cervical screening programme.
Bokan T; Ivanus U; Jerman T; Takac I; Arko D
Radiol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 55(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 33764704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Can Genomic Amplification of Human Telomerase Gene and C-MYC in Liquid-Based Cytological Specimens Be Used as a Method for Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening?
Gao K; Eurasian M; Zhang J; Wei Y; Zheng Q; Ye H; Li L
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2015; 80(3):153-63. PubMed ID: 25832290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prospective evaluation of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology for managing women with abnormal Papanicolaou cytology: PALMS study results.
Bergeron C; Ikenberg H; Sideri M; Denton K; Bogers J; Schmidt D; Alameda F; Keller T; Rehm S; Ridder R;
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Jun; 123(6):373-81. PubMed ID: 25891096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Evaluation of the effectiveness of BMRT-HPV for cervical cancer screening].
Duan LF; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Qu XF; Duan XZ; Liu Y; Shi B; Zhang W; Wei LH; Belinson L; Wu RF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 55(10):708-715. PubMed ID: 33120484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Primary cervical cancer screening and triage using an mRNA human papillomavirus assay and visual inspection.
Nieves L; Enerson CL; Belinson S; Brainard J; Chiesa-Vottero A; Nagore N; Booth C; Pérez AG; Chávez-Avilés MN; Belinson J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Mar; 23(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 23334437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Intracellular human papillomavirus E6, E7 mRNA quantification predicts CIN 2+ in cervical biopsies better than Papanicolaou screening for women regardless of age.
Pierry D; Weiss G; Lack B; Chen V; Fusco J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Aug; 136(8):956-60. PubMed ID: 22849745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
Canfell K; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Heley S; Brotherton J; Gertig D; Jennett CJ; Farnsworth A; Tan J; Wrede CD; Castle PE; Saville M
PLoS Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002388. PubMed ID: 28926579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A comparison of linear array and hybrid capture 2 for detection of carcinogenic human papillomavirus and cervical precancer in ASCUS-LSIL triage study.
Gravitt PE; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Wheeler CM; Castle PE
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 May; 17(5):1248-54. PubMed ID: 18483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Type- and age-specific distribution of human papillomavirus in women attending cervical cancer screening in Finland.
Leinonen MK; Anttila A; Malila N; Dillner J; Forslund O; Nieminen P
Br J Cancer; 2013 Nov; 109(11):2941-50. PubMed ID: 24136148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Combined p16INK4a and human papillomavirus testing improves the prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN II-III) in Thai patients with low-grade cytological abnormalities.
Ekalaksananan T; Pientong C; Kongyingyoes B; Chaiwongkot A; Yuenyao P; Kleebkaow P; Kritpetcharat O; Evans MF
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1777-83. PubMed ID: 22126564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Risk-adapted primary HPV cervical cancer screening project in Wolfsburg, Germany--experience over 3 years.
Luyten A; Scherbring S; Reinecke-Lüthge A; Braun BE; Pietralla M; Theiler K; Petry KU
J Clin Virol; 2009 Nov; 46 Suppl 3():S5-10. PubMed ID: 20129072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Cervix cytology samples revealed increased methylation of the human markers FAM19A4/miR124-2 up to 8 years before adenocarcinoma.
Lindroth Y; Pedersen L; Alssamaray J; Berglund T; Sundqvist A; Borgfeldt C; Forslund O
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Feb; 103(2):378-386. PubMed ID: 37964497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis.
Arbyn M; Verdoodt F; Snijders PJ; Verhoef VM; Suonio E; Dillner L; Minozzi S; Bellisario C; Banzi R; Zhao FH; Hillemanns P; Anttila A
Lancet Oncol; 2014 Feb; 15(2):172-83. PubMed ID: 24433684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of conventional and liquid-based Pap smear methods in the diagnosis of precancerous cervical lesions.
Honarvar Z; Zarisfi Z; Salari Sedigh S; Masoumi Shahrbabak M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):2320-2324. PubMed ID: 35579303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A population-based observational study comparing Cervista and Hybrid Capture 2 methods: improved relative specificity of the Cervista assay by increasing its cut-off.
Boehmer G; Wang L; Iftner A; Holz B; Haedicke J; von Wasielewski R; Martus P; Iftner T
BMC Infect Dis; 2014 Dec; 14():674. PubMed ID: 25487281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus types and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in women over 30 years of age in St. Petersburg, Russia.
Shipitsyna E; Zolotoverkhaya E; Kuevda D; Nasonova V; Romanyuk T; Khachaturyan A; Orlova O; Abashova E; Kostyuchek I; Shipulina O; Anttila A; Savicheva A
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 35(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 20884314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
