These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28797113)

  • 1. Clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting BioMatrix stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting Xience stents.
    Lee DH; Park TK; Song YB; Chun WJ; Choi RK; Jeong JO; Im ES; Kim SW; Lee JM; Yang JH; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Choi JH; Lee SH; Gwon HC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183079. PubMed ID: 28797113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).
    Vlachojannis GJ; Smits PC; Hofma SH; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; den Heijer P; van der Ent M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(12):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 28579236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Final 3-Year Outcome of a Randomized Trial Comparing Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Using Either Biodegradable Polymer or Durable Polymer: NOBORI Biolimus-Eluting Versus XIENCE/PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial.
    Natsuaki M; Kozuma K; Morimoto T; Kadota K; Muramatsu T; Nakagawa Y; Akasaka T; Igarashi K; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Ishikawa T; Nishikawa H; Awata M; Abe M; Okada H; Takatsu Y; Ogata N; Kimura K; Urasawa K; Tarutani Y; Shiode N; Kimura T
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Oct; 8(10):. PubMed ID: 26446596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Lee HJ; Park TK; Song YB; Choi YJ; Yu CW; Yang JH; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Choi RK; Choi JH; Park JS; Kim JS; Kim TH; Jang HJ; Lee SH; Shim WH; Roh YM; Gwon HC
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 183():190-7. PubMed ID: 25668147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unselected Use of Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization.
    Yamaji K; Zanchin T; Zanchin C; Stortecky S; Koskinas KC; Hunziker L; Praz F; Blöchlinger S; Moro C; Moschovitis A; Seiler C; Valgimigli M; Billinger M; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Windecker S; Räber L
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(9):e006741. PubMed ID: 30354590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.
    Zbinden R; Piccolo R; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Muller O; Vuilliomenet A; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Jamshidi P; Franzone A; Eberli F; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Mar; 5(3):e003255. PubMed ID: 26979080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-year clinical outcomes of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting durable-polymer-coated stents versus biolimus-eluting biodegradable-polymer-coated stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction with dyslipidemia after percutaneous coronary intervention: data from the KAMIR.
    Kim YH; Her AY; Jeong MH; Kim BK; Hong SJ; Shin DH; Kim JS; Ko YG; Choi D; Hong MK; Jang Y
    Heart Vessels; 2019 Feb; 34(2):237-250. PubMed ID: 30167772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biolimus-eluting versus everolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis from the NEXT (NOBORI biolimus-eluting versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent) and COMPARE II (Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent) randomised trials.
    Vlachojannis GJ; Puricel S; Natsuaki M; Morimoto T; Smits PC; Kimura T
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Mar; 12(16):1970-1977. PubMed ID: 27802927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary bifurcations.
    Costopoulos C; Latib A; Naganuma T; Sticchi A; Ferrarello S; Regazzoli D; Chieffo A; Figini F; Carlino M; Montorfano M; Naim C; Kawaguchi M; Gerasimou A; Giannini F; Godino C; Colombo A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 83(6):889-95. PubMed ID: 23804318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.
    Serruys PW; Farooq V; Kalesan B; de Vries T; Buszman P; Linke A; Ischinger T; Klauss V; Eberli F; Wijns W; Morice MC; Di Mario C; Corti R; Antoni D; Sohn HY; Eerdmans P; Rademaker-Havinga T; van Es GA; Meier B; Jüni P; Windecker S
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):777-89. PubMed ID: 23968698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: propensity score-matched analysis.
    Lee JH; Lee JW; Youn YJ; Ahn MS; Ahn SG; Kim JY; Yoo BS; Lee SH; Choi E; Yoon J
    J Interv Cardiol; 2014 Aug; 27(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 25052960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical outcomes according to diabetic status in patients treated with biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: prespecified subgroup analysis of the BIOSCIENCE trial.
    Franzone A; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Vuilliomenet A; Muller O; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Jamshidi P; Räber L; Stortecky S; Wenaweser P; Jüni P; Windecker S
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 26043895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical outcomes with bioabsorbable polymer- versus durable polymer-based drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis.
    Palmerini T; Biondi-Zoccai G; Della Riva D; Mariani A; Sabaté M; Smits PC; Kaiser C; D'Ascenzo F; Frati G; Mancone M; Genereux P; Stone GW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 63(4):299-307. PubMed ID: 24211507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and efficacy profile of bioresorbable-polylactide-polymer-biolimus-A9-eluting stents versus durable-polymer-everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
    Jaguszewski M; Dörig M; Frangieh AH; Ghadri JR; Cammann VL; Diekmann J; Napp LC; D'Ascenzo F; Imori Y; Obeid S; Maier W; Lüscher TF; Templin C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(6):E173-E182. PubMed ID: 27377554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
    Iglesias JF; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Lanz J; Rigamonti F; Muller O; Moarof I; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Cuculi F; Valgimigli M; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Nov; 8(22):e013607. PubMed ID: 31696762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Polymer-Free Biolimus-Eluting Stent and Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent in All-Comer Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
    Pepe M; Biondi-Zoccai G; Corcione N; Nestola PL; Ferraro P; Morello A; Conte S; Prati F; Bianchi FP; Bortone AS; Giordano A
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Jul; 124(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 31103132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.
    Tamburino C; Capranzano P; Gori T; Latib A; Lesiak M; Nef H; Caramanno G; Naber C; Mehilli J; Di Mario C; Sabaté M; Münzel T; Colombo A; Araszkiewicz A; Wiebe J; Geraci S; Jensen C; Mattesini A; Brugaletta S; Capodanno D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 9(5):440-9. PubMed ID: 26875648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Everolimus-Eluting Biodegradable Polymer Versus Everolimus-Eluting Durable Polymer Stent for Coronary Revascularization in Routine Clinical Practice.
    Zanchin C; Ueki Y; Zanchin T; Häner J; Otsuka T; Stortecky S; Koskinas KC; Siontis GCM; Praz F; Moschovitis A; Hunziker L; Valgimigli M; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Windecker S; Räber L
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(17):1665-1675. PubMed ID: 31422088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.
    Roguin A; Kandzari DE; Marcusohn E; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JM; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(10):e007331. PubMed ID: 30354631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioresorbable polymer-coated thin strut sirolimus-eluting stent vs durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in daily clinical practice: Propensity matched one-year results from interventional cardiology network registry.
    Gasior P; Gierlotka M; Szczurek-Katanski K; Osuch M; Gnot R; Hawranek M; Gasior M; Polonski L
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jun; 93(7):E362-E368. PubMed ID: 30298545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.