These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with diabetes mellitus: 5 years follow-up from the COMPARE II trial. Paradies V; Vlachojannis GJ; Royaards KJ; Wassing J; van der Ent M; Smits PC Int J Cardiol; 2019 Sep; 290():40-44. PubMed ID: 31101545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer biolimus A9-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in diabetic patients: a prospective non-randomized single-centre long-term comparison. Sprimont P; Pierard S; Vanoverschelde JL; Debbas N Acta Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 69(5):523-31. PubMed ID: 25638840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of current smoking on 2-year clinical outcomes between durable-polymer-coated stents and biodegradable-polymer-coated stents in acute myocardial infarction after successful percutaneous coronary intervention: Data from the KAMIR. Kim YH; Her AY; Jeong MH; Kim BK; Hong SJ; Shin DH; Kim JS; Ko YG; Choi D; Hong MK; Jang Y PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205046. PubMed ID: 30289945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term comparison of everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting stents. Puricel S; Oberhänsli M; Guntern P; Lehmann S; Goy JJ; Arroyo D; Villeneuve H; Baeriswyl G; Stauffer JC; Togni M; Cook S EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 23482296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Everolimus-Eluting Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymers in Unselected Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial With 1-Year Follow-Up (SORT OUT VIII Trial). Maeng M; Christiansen EH; Raungaard B; Kahlert J; Terkelsen CJ; Kristensen SD; Carstensen S; Aarøe J; Jensen SE; Villadsen AB; Lassen JF; Thim T; Eftekhari A; Veien KT; Hansen KN; Junker A; Bøtker HE; Jensen LO; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 12(7):624-633. PubMed ID: 30947936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-term outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sakurai R; Burazor I; Bonneau HN; Kaneda H Int J Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 223():1066-1071. PubMed ID: 27634137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Durable-Polymer- and Biodegradable-Polymer-Based Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Prediabetes After Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Kim YH; Her AY; Jeong MH; Kim BK; Hong SJ; Kim S; Ahn CM; Kim JS; Ko YG; Choi D; Hong MK; Jang Y Int Heart J; 2020 Jul; 61(4):673-684. PubMed ID: 32684595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Midterm Clinical Impacts of Biodegradable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents Compared with Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A 3-Year Propensity-Matched Study. Matsuda H; Kagase A; Tokuda T; Ochiumi Y; Murata A; Suzuki Y; Ito T J Interv Cardiol; 2020; 2020():2869303. PubMed ID: 32395090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT clinical trials program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions). Dangas GD; Serruys PW; Kereiakes DJ; Hermiller J; Rizvi A; Newman W; Sudhir K; Smith RS; Cao S; Theodoropoulos K; Cutlip DE; Lansky AJ; Stone GW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 6(9):914-22. PubMed ID: 24050859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biodegradable or durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ten-year outcomes of the randomised NEXT Trial. Natsuaki M; Watanabe H; Morimoto T; Kozuma K; Kadota K; Muramatsu T; Nakagawa Y; Akasaka T; Hanaoka KI; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Ishikawa T; Katoh H; Nishikawa H; Tamura T; Ono K; Yamamoto K; Ishihara T; Abe M; Taniguchi R; Ikari Y; Okada K; Kimura T EuroIntervention; 2023 Aug; 19(5):e402-e413. PubMed ID: 37395475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A randomised comparison of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: clinical and angiographic follow-up of the TARGET I trial. Gao RL; Xu B; Lansky AJ; Yang YJ; Ma CS; Han YL; Chen SL; Li H; Zhang RY; Fu GS; Yuan ZY; Jiang H; Huo Y; Li W; Zhang YJ; Leon MB; EuroIntervention; 2013 May; 9(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 23685298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularisation: 5-year outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE randomised trial. Pilgrim T; Piccolo R; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Muller O; Moarof I; Siontis GCM; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Cuculi F; Hunziker L; Eberli FR; Jüni P; Windecker S Lancet; 2018 Sep; 392(10149):737-746. PubMed ID: 30170848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes From a Trial of Three Limus-Eluting Stents With Different Polymer Coatings in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Kufner S; Joner M; Thannheimer A; Hoppmann P; Ibrahim T; Mayer K; Cassese S; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Kastrati A; Byrne RA; Circulation; 2019 Jan; 139(3):325-333. PubMed ID: 30586724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (COMPARE II): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Smits PC; Hofma S; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; Vuillomenet A; Serra A; Nouche RT; den Heijer P; van der Ent M Lancet; 2013 Feb; 381(9867):651-60. PubMed ID: 23374650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. 2-year clinical follow-up from the randomized comparison of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer and sirolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in routine clinical practice. Klauss V; Serruys PW; Pilgrim T; Buszman P; Linke A; Ischinger T; Eberli F; Corti R; Wijns W; Morice MC; di Mario C; van Geuns RJ; van Es GA; Kalesan B; Wenaweser P; Jüni P; Windecker S JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 4(8):887-95. PubMed ID: 21851904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions. Dan K; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kolm P; Windecker S; Saito S; Kandzari DE; Waksman R Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Sep; 13(9):e009189. PubMed ID: 32895004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Nobori-Biolimus-Eluting Stents versus Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Coronary Intervention: A Propensity Score Matching. Tantawy A; Ahn CM; Shin DH; Kim JS; Kim BK; Ko YG; Choi D; Jang Y; Hong MK Yonsei Med J; 2017 Mar; 58(2):290-295. PubMed ID: 28120558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]