These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28797898)

  • 21. The role of saccade preparation in lateralized word recognition: evidence for the attentional bias theory.
    Vergilino Perez D; Lemoine C; Siéroff E; Ergis AM; Bouhired R; Rigault E; Doré-Mazars K
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Oct; 50(12):2796-2804. PubMed ID: 22889805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus.
    Castro-Barros BA; Righi LL; Grechi G; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 17961895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The right hemisphere advantage in visual change detection depends on temporal factors.
    Spotorno S; Faure S
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Dec; 77(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 21986367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in the absence of low spatial frequencies.
    Okubo M; Michimata C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 11970792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A right hemisphere advantage at early cortical stages of processing alphanumeric stimuli. Evidence from electrophysiology.
    Asanowicz D; Verleger R; Kruse L; Beier K; Śmigasiewicz K
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Apr; 113():40-55. PubMed ID: 28113099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hemispheric differences for visual matrix processing: stimulus size and spatial frequency effects.
    Pedersen HK; Polich J
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Dec; 47(3):525-38. PubMed ID: 11748906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of spatial attention on motion discrimination are greater in the left than right visual field.
    Bosworth RG; Petrich JA; Dobkins KR
    Vision Res; 2012 Jan; 52(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 22051893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Isolating the internal in endogenous attention.
    Hopfinger JB; Camblin CC; Parks EL
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Jul; 47(4):739-47. PubMed ID: 20149137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The left visual-field advantage in rapid visual presentation is amplified rather than reduced by posterior-parietal rTMS.
    Verleger R; Möller F; Kuniecki M; Smigasiewicz K; Groppa S; Siebner HR
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 203(2):355-65. PubMed ID: 20401472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hemispheric asymmetries in categorical perception of orientation in infants and adults.
    Franklin A; Catherwood D; Alvarez J; Axelsson E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 20519136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Processing of bilateral versus unilateral conditions: evidence for the functional contribution of the ventral attention network.
    Beume LA; Kaller CP; Hoeren M; Klöppel S; Kuemmerer D; Glauche V; Köstering L; Mader I; Rijntjes M; Weiller C; Umarova R
    Cortex; 2015 May; 66():91-102. PubMed ID: 25824980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Right hemifield deficits in judging simultaneity: a perceptual learning study.
    Matthews N; Vawter M; Kelly JG
    J Vis; 2012 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 22303023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The neural basis of the right visual field advantage in reading: an MEG analysis using virtual electrodes.
    Barca L; Cornelissen P; Simpson M; Urooj U; Woods W; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2011 Sep; 118(3):53-71. PubMed ID: 20932563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ERP effects of spatial attention and display search with unilateral and bilateral stimulus displays.
    Lange JJ; Wijers AA; Mulder LJ; Mulder G
    Biol Psychol; 1999 Jul; 50(3):203-33. PubMed ID: 10461806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Orienting visuospatial attention generates manual reaction time asymmetries in target detection and pointing.
    Barthélémy S; Boulinguez P
    Behav Brain Res; 2002 Jun; 133(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 12048178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The upper-hemifield advantage for masked face processing: Not just an attentional bias.
    Quek GL; Finkbeiner M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):52-68. PubMed ID: 26515816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lateralized responses during covert attention are modulated by target eccentricity.
    Bahramisharif A; Heskes T; Jensen O; van Gerven MA
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Mar; 491(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 21215296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The left visual field attentional advantage: No evidence of different speeds of processing across visual hemifields.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 37():16-26. PubMed ID: 26261896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition.
    Nicholls ME; Wood AG
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Dec; 38(3):339-57. PubMed ID: 9841790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.