These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28798551)

  • 21. Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study.
    Khorasani M; Janbaz P; Rayati F
    J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 44(3):128-135. PubMed ID: 29963494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. E-M shaped septal encircling with Medpor reconstruction on crooked noses: personal technique and postoperative results.
    Emsen IM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):216-26. PubMed ID: 18216692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of Chronic Sphenoid Sinusitis After Sellar Reconstruction with Medpor Porous Polyethylene Implant.
    Farrell NF; Kingdom TT; Getz AE; Lillehei KO; Youssef AS; Ramakrishnan VR
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Mar; 123():e781-e786. PubMed ID: 30579017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Secondary reconstruction for unfavorable microtia results utilizing temporoparietal and innominate fascia flaps.
    Nagata S
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Aug; 94(2):254-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 8041816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Postoperative Complications in Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction With Medpor.
    de Moraes Ferreira AC; Muñoz XM; Okamoto R; Pellizer EP; Garcia IR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):425-8. PubMed ID: 26963299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Ear reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants. Effect of cortisone on edema reduction and healing process].
    Naumann A; Ehrmantraut S; Willnecker V; Menger MD; Schick B; Laschke MW
    HNO; 2011 Mar; 59(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 21206991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Porous polyethylene implants for ear reconstruction of middle to high-grade ear defects].
    Naumann A
    HNO; 2011 Feb; 59(2):197-212; quiz 213-4. PubMed ID: 21416395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Medpor in maxillofacial deformities: report of three cases.
    Andrade NN; Raikwar K
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2009 Jun; 8(2):192-5. PubMed ID: 23139505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Porous Polyethylene Versus Autologous Costochondral Reconstruction for Microtia: Incidence and Analysis of Secondary Procedures.
    Varagur K; Zubovic E; Skolnick GB; Buss J; Snyder-Warwick A; Reinisch J; Patel KB
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2024 Mar; 61(3):365-372. PubMed ID: 36217745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A New Flap Technique for Reconstruction of Microtia and Congenital Aural Atresia.
    Chen K; Jiang C; Wu Q; Sun Y; Shi R
    Indian J Surg; 2015 Dec; 77(Suppl 3):1237-41. PubMed ID: 27011544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modification of two-flap method and framework construction for reconstruction of atypical congenital auricular deformities.
    Park C
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Jun; 99(7):1846-57. PubMed ID: 9180708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Autogenous temporalis fascia patch graft for porous polyethylene (Medpor) sphere orbital implant exposure.
    Sagoo MS; Olver JM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):942-6. PubMed ID: 15205243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Auricular reconstruction by soft tissue expansion techniques without skin grafting].
    Liu JF; Sun JM; Li XD
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 28(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 22737937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Secondary revisions due to unfavourable results after microtia reconstruction.
    Lee TS; Lim SY; Pyon JK; Mun GH; Bang SI; Oh KS
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Jun; 63(6):940-6. PubMed ID: 19451041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exposure of high-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) used for contour restoration and treatment.
    Sevin K; Askar I; Saray A; Yormuk E
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Feb; 38(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 10783447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical experience with the Medpor porous polyethylene implant.
    Wellisz T
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 1993; 17(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 8273538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microtia repair.
    Quatela VC; Goldman ND
    Facial Plast Surg; 1995 Oct; 11(4):257-73. PubMed ID: 9046614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Outcome of Auricular Reconstruction with Porous Polyethylene Frameworks: Our 10 Years of Experience with 113 Children and Adults.
    Schrötzlmair F; Götz K; Patscheider M; Hempel JM
    Facial Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 38(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 34144622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of porous high-density polyethylene grafts in open rhinoplasty: no infectious complication seen in spreader and dorsal grafts.
    Mohammadi S; Mohseni M; Eslami M; Arabzadeh H; Eslami M
    Head Face Med; 2014 Dec; 10():52. PubMed ID: 25534471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Porous high-density polyethylene implants in auricular reconstruction.
    Williams JD; Romo T; Sclafani AP; Cho H
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Jun; 123(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 9193216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.