283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28799983)
1. Discrimination of Voice Pitch and Vocal-Tract Length in Cochlear Implant Users.
Gaudrain E; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):226-237. PubMed ID: 28799983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prelingually Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants Show Better Perception of Voice Cues and Speech in Competing Speech Than Postlingually Deaf Adults With Cochlear Implants.
Nagels L; Gaudrain E; Vickers D; Hendriks P; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):952-968. PubMed ID: 38616318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gender categorization is abnormal in cochlear implant users.
Fuller CD; Gaudrain E; Clarke JN; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Free RH; Başkent D
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 15(6):1037-48. PubMed ID: 25172111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Spectral Contrast Enhancement on Speech-on-Speech Intelligibility and Voice Cue Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Users.
El Boghdady N; Langner F; Gaudrain E; Başkent D; Nogueira W
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):271-289. PubMed ID: 32925307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Children With Normal Hearing Are Efficient Users of Fundamental Frequency and Vocal Tract Length Cues for Voice Discrimination.
Zaltz Y; Goldsworthy RL; Eisenberg LS; Kishon-Rabin L
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):182-193. PubMed ID: 31107364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Channel Interaction on Vocal Cue Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Nogueira W; Boghdady NE; Langner F; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211030166. PubMed ID: 34461780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Use of Voice Cues for Speaker Gender Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Meister H; Fürsen K; Streicher B; Lang-Roth R; Walger M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 59(3):546-56. PubMed ID: 27135985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short Implicit Voice Training Affects Listening Effort During a Voice Cue Sensitivity Task With Vocoder-Degraded Speech.
Biçer A; Koelewijn T; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):900-916. PubMed ID: 36695603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does good perception of vocal characteristics relate to better speech-on-speech intelligibility for cochlear implant users?
El Boghdady N; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan; 145(1):417. PubMed ID: 30710943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The discrimination of voice cues in simulations of bimodal electro-acoustic cochlear-implant hearing.
Başkent D; Luckmann A; Ceha J; Gaudrain E; Tamati TN
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):EL292. PubMed ID: 29716273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors limiting vocal-tract length discrimination in cochlear implant simulations.
Gaudrain E; Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1298-308. PubMed ID: 25786943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perception of voice cues in school-age children with hearing aids.
Babaoğlu G; Rachman L; Ertürk P; Özkişi Yazgan B; Sennaroğlu G; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jan; 155(1):722-741. PubMed ID: 38284822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Voice Discrimination by Adults with Cochlear Implants: the Benefits of Early Implantation for Vocal-Tract Length Perception.
Zaltz Y; Goldsworthy RL; Kishon-Rabin L; Eisenberg LS
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 19(2):193-209. PubMed ID: 29313147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parameter-Specific Morphing Reveals Contributions of Timbre and Fundamental Frequency Cues to the Perception of Voice Gender and Age in Cochlear Implant Users.
Skuk VG; Kirchen L; Oberhoffner T; Guntinas-Lichius O; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 63(9):3155-3175. PubMed ID: 32881631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of lexical content, acoustic and linguistic variability, and vocoding on voice cue perception.
Koelewijn T; Gaudrain E; Tamati T; Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Sep; 150(3):1620. PubMed ID: 34598602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Role of Word Content, Sentence Information, and Vocoding for Voice Cue Perception.
Koelewijn T; Gaudrain E; Shehab T; Treczoks T; Başkent D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Sep; 66(9):3665-3676. PubMed ID: 37556819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of frequency mismatch and band partitioning on vocal tract length perception in vocoder simulations of cochlear implant processing.
El Boghdady N; Başkent D; Gaudrain E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):3505. PubMed ID: 29960490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.
Chatterjee M; Peng SC
Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 18093766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
