These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28800005)

  • 1. The Effects of British Army Footwear on Ground Reaction Force and Temporal Parameters of British Army Foot Drill.
    Rawcliffe AJ; Graham SM; Simpson RJ; Moir GL; Martindale RJJ; Psycharakis SG; Connaboy C
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Mar; 34(3):754-762. PubMed ID: 28800005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of the Kinetics of British Army Foot Drill in Untrained Personnel.
    Rawcliffe AJ; Simpson RJ; Graham SM; Psycharakis SG; Moir GL; Connaboy C
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Feb; 31(2):435-444. PubMed ID: 27442331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Altered Dynamic Postural Stability and Joint Position Sense Following British Army Foot-Drill.
    Rawcliffe AJ; Hinde KL; Graham SM; Martindale R; Morrison A; Krajewski KT; Connaboy C
    Front Sports Act Living; 2020; 2():584275. PubMed ID: 33345154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of new military athletic footwear on the kinetics and kinematics of running in relation to army boots.
    Sinclair J; Taylor PJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2900-8. PubMed ID: 24714532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Force and acceleration characteristics of military foot drill: implications for injury risk in recruits.
    Carden PP; Izard RM; Greeves JP; Lake JP; Myers SD
    BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med; 2015; 1(1):. PubMed ID: 27900110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of running shoes and cross-trainers on Achilles tendon forces during running compared with military boots.
    Sinclair J; Taylor PJ; Atkins S
    J R Army Med Corps; 2015 Jun; 161(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 25428136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Running ground reaction forces across footwear conditions are predicted from the motion of two body mass components.
    Udofa AB; Clark KP; Ryan LJ; Weyand PG
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2019 May; 126(5):1315-1325. PubMed ID: 30763160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptation of Running Biomechanics to Repeated Barefoot Running: A Randomized Controlled Study.
    Hollander K; Liebl D; Meining S; Mattes K; Willwacher S; Zech A
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Jul; 47(8):1975-1983. PubMed ID: 31166116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does "transition shoe" promote an intermediate biomechanical condition compared to running in conventional shoe and in reduced protection condition?
    da Silva Azevedo AP; Mezêncio B; Valvassori R; Mochizuki L; Amadio AC; Serrão JC
    Gait Posture; 2016 May; 46():142-6. PubMed ID: 27131192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimates of Tibial Shock Magnitude in Men and Women at the Start and End of a Military Drill Training Program.
    Rice HM; Saunders SC; McGuire SJ; O'Leary TJ; Izard RM
    Mil Med; 2018 Sep; 183(9-10):e392-e398. PubMed ID: 29590455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Footwear Matters: Influence of Footwear and Foot Strike on Load Rates during Running.
    Rice HM; Jamison ST; Davis IS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Dec; 48(12):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27387292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term changes in running mechanics and foot strike pattern after introduction to minimalistic footwear.
    Willson JD; Bjorhus JS; Williams DS; Butler RJ; Porcari JP; Kernozek TW
    PM R; 2014 Jan; 6(1):34-43; quiz 43. PubMed ID: 23999160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cypriot and greek army military boot cushioning: ground reaction forces and subjective responses.
    Paisis P; Hanley B; Havenetidis K; Bissas A
    Mil Med; 2013 Apr; 178(4):e493-7. PubMed ID: 23707838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional Evaluation of a Shock Absorbing Insole During Military Training in a Group of Soldiers: A Pilot Study.
    Lullini G; Giangrande A; Caravaggi P; Leardini A; Berti L
    Mil Med; 2020 Jun; 185(5-6):e643-e648. PubMed ID: 32175582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact attenuation during weight bearing activities in barefoot vs. shod conditions: a systematic review.
    Fong Yan A; Sinclair PJ; Hiller C; Wegener C; Smith RM
    Gait Posture; 2013 Jun; 38(2):175-86. PubMed ID: 23245643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of military footwear and workload on ground reaction forces during a simulated lateral ankle sprain mechanism.
    Simpson JD; DeBusk H; Hill C; Knight A; Chander H
    Foot (Edinb); 2018 Mar; 34():53-57. PubMed ID: 29288908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of a commercially available orthotic device on rearfoot eversion and vertical ground reaction force when running in military footwear.
    Dixon SJ
    Mil Med; 2007 Apr; 172(4):446-50. PubMed ID: 17484322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shock attenuation characteristics of three different military boots during gait.
    Muniz AMS; Bini RR
    Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():59-65. PubMed ID: 28738226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of anti-pronation shoes on lower limb kinematics and kinetics in female runners with pronated feet: The role of physical fatigue.
    Jafarnezhadgero A; Alavi-Mehr SM; Granacher U
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216818. PubMed ID: 31086402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of shoe aging on children running biomechanics.
    Herbaut A; Chavet P; Roux M; Guéguen N; Barbier F; Simoneau-Buessinger E
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jul; 56():123-128. PubMed ID: 28544949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.