302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28800611)
41. Construction of an Inducible CRISPR/Cas9 System for CXCR4 Gene and Demonstration of its Effects on MKN-45 Cells.
Peng Y; Yang T; Tang X; Chen F; Wang S
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2020 Mar; 78(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 31875277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effective gene editing by high-fidelity base editor 2 in mouse zygotes.
Liang P; Sun H; Sun Y; Zhang X; Xie X; Zhang J; Zhang Z; Chen Y; Ding C; Xiong Y; Ma W; Liu D; Huang J; Songyang Z
Protein Cell; 2017 Aug; 8(8):601-611. PubMed ID: 28585179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Highly Efficient CRISPR-Cas9-Based Methods for Generating Deletion Mutations and F0 Embryos that Lack Gene Function in Zebrafish.
Hoshijima K; Jurynec MJ; Klatt Shaw D; Jacobi AM; Behlke MA; Grunwald DJ
Dev Cell; 2019 Dec; 51(5):645-657.e4. PubMed ID: 31708433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Postnatal Cardiac Gene Editing Using CRISPR/Cas9 With AAV9-Mediated Delivery of Short Guide RNAs Results in Mosaic Gene Disruption.
Johansen AK; Molenaar B; Versteeg D; Leitoguinho AR; Demkes C; Spanjaard B; de Ruiter H; Akbari Moqadam F; Kooijman L; Zentilin L; Giacca M; van Rooij E
Circ Res; 2017 Oct; 121(10):1168-1181. PubMed ID: 28851809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Improving CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis efficiency by delaying the early development of zebrafish embryos.
Terzioglu M; Saralahti A; Piippo H; Rämet M; Andressoo JO
Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):21023. PubMed ID: 33273577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Expanding CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Capacity in Zebrafish Using SaCas9.
Feng Y; Chen C; Han Y; Chen Z; Lu X; Liang F; Li S; Qin W; Lin S
G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Aug; 6(8):2517-21. PubMed ID: 27317783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing of Transcription Factor Genes in Marchantia polymorpha.
Sugano SS; Nishihama R
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1830():109-126. PubMed ID: 30043367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. DeepCRISTL: deep transfer learning to predict CRISPR/Cas9 functional and endogenous on-target editing efficiency.
Elkayam S; Orenstein Y
Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 38(Suppl 1):i161-i168. PubMed ID: 35758815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Highly Efficient Mouse Genome Editing by CRISPR Ribonucleoprotein Electroporation of Zygotes.
Chen S; Lee B; Lee AY; Modzelewski AJ; He L
J Biol Chem; 2016 Jul; 291(28):14457-67. PubMed ID: 27151215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Microinjection of Antisense Morpholinos, CRISPR/Cas9 RNP, and RNA/DNA into Zebrafish Embryos.
Xin Y; Duan C
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1742():205-211. PubMed ID: 29330802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Optimization of the production of knock-in alleles by CRISPR/Cas9 microinjection into the mouse zygote.
Raveux A; Vandormael-Pournin S; Cohen-Tannoudji M
Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():42661. PubMed ID: 28209967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Nucleosome breathing and remodeling constrain CRISPR-Cas9 function.
Isaac RS; Jiang F; Doudna JA; Lim WA; Narlikar GJ; Almeida R
Elife; 2016 Apr; 5():. PubMed ID: 27130520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Optimization of genome editing through CRISPR-Cas9 engineering.
Zhang JH; Adikaram P; Pandey M; Genis A; Simonds WF
Bioengineered; 2016 Apr; 7(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 27340770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Guidelines for optimized gene knockout using CRISPR/Cas9.
Campenhout CV; Cabochette P; Veillard AC; Laczik M; Zelisko-Schmidt A; Sabatel C; Dhainaut M; Vanhollebeke B; Gueydan C; Kruys V
Biotechniques; 2019 Jun; 66(6):295-302. PubMed ID: 31039627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Precision genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 and linear repair templates in C. elegans.
Paix A; Folkmann A; Seydoux G
Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():86-93. PubMed ID: 28392263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Site-Directed Genome Knockout in Chicken Cell Line and Embryos Can Use CRISPR/Cas Gene Editing Technology.
Zuo Q; Wang Y; Cheng S; Lian C; Tang B; Wang F; Lu Z; Ji Y; Zhao R; Zhang W; Jin K; Song J; Zhang Y; Li B
G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Jun; 6(6):1787-92. PubMed ID: 27172204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Genome Editing in Mice Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology.
Hall B; Cho A; Limaye A; Cho K; Khillan J; Kulkarni AB
Curr Protoc Cell Biol; 2018 Dec; 81(1):e57. PubMed ID: 30178917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Zebrafish Embryonic Slow Muscle Is a Rapid System for Genetic Analysis of Sarcomere Organization by CRISPR/Cas9, but Not NgAgo.
Cai M; Si Y; Zhang J; Tian Z; Du S
Mar Biotechnol (NY); 2018 Apr; 20(2):168-181. PubMed ID: 29374849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Development of a gRNA Expression and Processing Platform for Efficient CRISPR-Cas9-Based Gene Editing and Gene Silencing in Candida tropicalis.
Li Y; Zhang L; Yang H; Xia Y; Liu L; Chen X; Shen W
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Jun; 10(3):e0005922. PubMed ID: 35543560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Evaluating the Efficiency of gRNAs in CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated Genome Editing in Poplars.
Bruegmann T; Deecke K; Fladung M
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jul; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 31344908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
