274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28800664)
1. Outcomes of Cranioplasty with Preformed Titanium versus Freehand Molded Polymethylmethacrylate Implants.
Höhne J; Werzmirzowsky K; Ott C; Hohenberger C; Hassanin BG; Brawanski A; Schebesch KM
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2018 May; 79(3):200-205. PubMed ID: 28800664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.
Wesp D; Krenzlin H; Jankovic D; Ottenhausen M; Jägersberg M; Ringel F; Keric N
Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3647-3655. PubMed ID: 36222944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical results of cranioplasty with a polymethylmethacrylate customized cranial implant in pediatric patients: a single-center experience.
Fiaschi P; Pavanello M; Imperato A; Dallolio V; Accogli A; Capra V; Consales A; Cama A; Piatelli G
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2016 Jun; 17(6):705-10. PubMed ID: 26824593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoperative template-molded bone flap reconstruction for patient-specific cranioplasty.
Marbacher S; Andereggen L; Erhardt S; Fathi AR; Fandino J; Raabe A; Beck J
Neurosurg Rev; 2012 Oct; 35(4):527-35; discussion 535. PubMed ID: 22391771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects.
Cabraja M; Klein M; Lehmann TN
Neurosurg Focus; 2009 Jun; 26(6):E10. PubMed ID: 19485714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Surgical Outcomes of Cranioplasty Using Titanium, Customized Polymethylmethacrylate, and Liquid Polymethylmethacrylate in Maharaj Nakhon Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand.
Vongsfak J; Vaniyapong T; Norasethada T; Watcharasaksilp W; Jetjumnong C; Srihagulang C; Limpastan K
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 33(5):1521-1524. PubMed ID: 34999614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term clinical outcome analysis of poly-methyl-methacrylate cranioplasty for large skull defects.
Jaberi J; Gambrell K; Tiwana P; Madden C; Finn R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e81-8. PubMed ID: 23351772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The "springform" technique in cranioplasty: custom made 3D-printed templates for intraoperative modelling of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants.
Pöppe JP; Spendel M; Schwartz C; Winkler PA; Wittig J
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Mar; 164(3):679-688. PubMed ID: 34873659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Translucent Customized Cranial Implants Made of Clear Polymethylmethacrylate: An Early Outcome Analysis of 55 Consecutive Cranioplasty Cases.
Shay T; Mitchell KA; Belzberg M; Zelko I; Mahapatra S; Qian J; Mendoza L; Huang J; Brem H; Gordon C
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Dec; 85(6):e27-e36. PubMed ID: 33170582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between autologous bone grafts and acrylic (PMMA) implants - A retrospective analysis of 286 cranioplasty procedures.
Vince GH; Kraschl J; Rauter H; Stein M; Grossauer S; Uhl E
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 61():205-209. PubMed ID: 30396817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-Term Complications of Cranioplasty Using Stored Autologous Bone Graft, Three-Dimensional Polymethyl Methacrylate, or Titanium Mesh After Decompressive Craniectomy: A Single-Center Experience After 596 Procedures.
Yeap MC; Tu PH; Liu ZH; Hsieh PC; Liu YT; Lee CY; Lai HY; Chen CT; Huang YC; Wei KC; Wu CT; Chen CC
World Neurosurg; 2019 Aug; 128():e841-e850. PubMed ID: 31082551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.
Oliver JD; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas KS; Sharaf B
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 May; 82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. PubMed ID: 30973834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Titanium Mesh and Custom Implants for Cranioplasty.
Rosinski CL; Patel S; Geever B; Chiu RG; Chaker AN; Zakrzewski J; Rosenberg DM; Parola R; Shah K; Behbahani M; Mehta AI
Neurosurgery; 2020 Jan; 86(1):E15-E22. PubMed ID: 31529096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cranioplasty Using Customized 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Implants: An International Collaboration Effort to Improve Neurosurgical Care.
Nguyen B; Ashraf O; Richards R; Tra H; Huynh T
World Neurosurg; 2021 May; 149():174-180. PubMed ID: 33647494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications following titanium cranioplasty compared with nontitanium implants cranioplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhu S; Chen Y; Lin F; Chen Z; Jiang X; Zhang J; Wang J
J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Feb; 84():66-74. PubMed ID: 33485602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical considerations in the use of polymethylmethacrylate in cranioplasty.
Lara WC; Schweitzer J; Lewis RP; Odum BC; Edlich RF; Gampper TJ
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1998; 8(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 10177458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cranioplasty for large skull defects with PMMA (Polymethylmethacrylate) or Tutoplast processed autogenic bone grafts.
Kriegel RJ; Schaller C; Clusmann H
Zentralbl Neurochir; 2007 Nov; 68(4):182-9. PubMed ID: 17966077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of polyetheretherketone and titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.
Thien A; King NK; Ang BT; Wang E; Ng I
World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 83(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 24909393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modified fixation of acrylic cranioplasty in the setting of titanium allergy.
Sinkin JC; Loftin S; Baker SB
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):e24-6. PubMed ID: 25565231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D-Printer-Assisted Patient-Specific Polymethyl Methacrylate Cranioplasty: A Case Series of 16 Consecutive Patients.
Schön SN; Skalicky N; Sharma N; Zumofen DW; Thieringer FM
World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():e356-e362. PubMed ID: 33418118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
