These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28801025)
1. Toward an MRI-based nomogram for the prediction of transperineal prostate biopsy outcome: A physician and patient decision tool. Lee SM; Liyanage SH; Wulaningsih W; Wolfe K; Carr T; Younis C; Van Hemelrijck M; Popert R; Acher P Urol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):664.e11-664.e18. PubMed ID: 28801025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) scoring in a transperineal prostate biopsy setting. Grey AD; Chana MS; Popert R; Wolfe K; Liyanage SH; Acher PL BJU Int; 2015 May; 115(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 25041307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer to reduce unnecessary biopsies within the prostate-specific antigen gray zone. Niu XK; Li J; Das SK; Xiong Y; Yang CB; Peng T BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 28143433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based risk model to determine the risk of significant prostate cancer prior to biopsy. van Leeuwen PJ; Hayen A; Thompson JE; Moses D; Shnier R; Böhm M; Abuodha M; Haynes AM; Ting F; Barentsz J; Roobol M; Vass J; Rasiah K; Delprado W; Stricker PD BJU Int; 2017 Dec; 120(6):774-781. PubMed ID: 28207981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance. Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a nomogram combining multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related parameters to enhance the detection of clinically significant cancer across different region. Zhou Z; Liang Z; Zuo Y; Zhou Y; Yan W; Wu X; Ji Z; Li H; Hu M; Ma L Prostate; 2022 Apr; 82(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 35098557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinical prediction tool to determine the need for concurrent systematic sampling at the time of magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy. Sathianathen NJ; Warlick CA; Weight CJ; Ordonez MA; Spilseth B; Metzger GJ; Murugan P; Konety BR BJU Int; 2019 Apr; 123(4):612-617. PubMed ID: 30417504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) and periprostatic fat thickness on multi-parametric MRI to predict the presence of prostate cancer. Cao Y; Cao M; Chen Y; Yu W; Fan Y; Liu Q; Gao G; Zhao Z; Wang X; Jin J Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(27):44040-44049. PubMed ID: 28476042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk Among Men Undergoing Combined MRI-targeted and Systematic Biopsy Using Novel Pre-biopsy Nomograms That Incorporate MRI Findings. Bjurlin MA; Rosenkrantz AB; Sarkar S; Lepor H; Huang WC; Huang R; Venkataraman R; Taneja SS Urology; 2018 Feb; 112():112-120. PubMed ID: 29155186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Prospective validation of a nomogram predictive of a positive initial prostate biopsy]. Ramírez-Backhaus M; Bahilo P; Arlandis S; Santamaría Navarro C; Pontones Moreno JL; Jiménez-Cruz F Actas Urol Esp; 2010 Jan; 34(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 20223131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting Benign Prostate Pathology on Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Men with a Prior Negative 12-core Systematic Biopsy: External Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram. Bjurlin MA; Renson A; Rais-Bahrami S; Truong M; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Taneja SS Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):815-822. PubMed ID: 29802053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An integrated nomogram combining deep learning, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring, and clinical variables for identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI: a retrospective multicentre study. Hiremath A; Shiradkar R; Fu P; Mahran A; Rastinehad AR; Tewari A; Tirumani SH; Purysko A; Ponsky L; Madabhushi A Lancet Digit Health; 2021 Jul; 3(7):e445-e454. PubMed ID: 34167765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen. Kuhl CK; Bruhn R; Krämer N; Nebelung S; Heidenreich A; Schrading S Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):493-505. PubMed ID: 28727544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies. Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cognitive versus Software-Assisted Registration: Development of a New Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer at MRI-Targeted Biopsies. Kaufmann S; Russo GI; Thaiss W; Notohamiprodjo M; Bamberg F; Bedke J; Morgia G; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Kruck S Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e953-e960. PubMed ID: 29685613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction. Distler FA; Radtke JP; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Schlemmer HP; Wieczorek K; Kirchner M; Pahernik S; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):575-582. PubMed ID: 28373135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial prostate biopsy: development and internal validation of a biopsy-specific nomogram based on the prostate cancer antigen 3 assay. Hansen J; Auprich M; Ahyai SA; de la Taille A; van Poppel H; Marberger M; Stenzl A; Mulders PF; Huland H; Fisch M; Abbou CC; Schalken JA; Fradet Y; Marks LS; Ellis W; Partin AW; Pummer K; Graefen M; Haese A; Walz J; Briganti A; Shariat SF; Chun FK Eur Urol; 2013 Feb; 63(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 22854248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Could Magnetic Resonance Imaging Help to Identify the Presence of Prostate Cancer Before Initial Biopsy? The Development of Nomogram Predicting the Outcomes of Prostate Biopsy in the Chinese Population. Fang D; Zhao C; Ren D; Yu W; Wang R; Wang H; Li X; Yin W; Yu X; Yang K; Liu P; Shan G; Li S; He Q; Wang X; Xin Z; Zhou L Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(13):4284-4292. PubMed ID: 27464612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Added value of systematic biopsy in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing biparametric MRI-targeted biopsy: multi-institutional external validation study. Falagario U; Jambor I; Taimen P; Syvänen KT; Kähkönen E; Merisaari H; Montoya Perez I; Knaapila J; Steiner A; Verho J; Tewari A; Aronen HJ; Carrieri G; Boström PJ; Ettala O World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 32778912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A predictive model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters for improved risk assessment and selection of biopsy-naïve men for prostate biopsies. Boesen L; Thomsen FB; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thomsen HS; Jakobsen H Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Dec; 22(4):609-616. PubMed ID: 30988407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]