227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28801241)
1. Trends in Radical Prostatectomy Risk Group Distribution in a European Multicenter Analysis of 28 572 Patients: Towards Tailored Treatment.
van den Bergh R; Gandaglia G; Tilki D; Borgmann H; Ost P; Surcel C; Valerio M; Sooriakumaran P; Salomon L; Briganti A; Graefen M; van der Poel H; de la Taille A; Montorsi F; Ploussard G;
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Mar; 5(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 28801241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is active surveillance a safe alternative in the management of localized prostate cancer? Pathological features of radical prostatectomy specimens in potential candidates for active surveillance.
Norman Z; Militza P; Andres F; Daniela F; Alejandro M; Catherine S; Juan F
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 24856482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changing Trends in Surgical Management of Prostate Cancer: The End of Overtreatment?
Huland H; Graefen M
Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 25736732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Definitive pathology at radical prostatectomy is commonly favorable in men following initial active surveillance.
Hong SK; Sternberg IA; Keren Paz GE; Kim PH; Touijer KA; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23954083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer following initial active surveillance: results from a prospective observational study.
Bul M; Zhu X; Rannikko A; Staerman F; Valdagni R; Pickles T; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2012 Aug; 62(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 22342775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.
Schiffmann J; Wenzel P; Salomon G; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Minner S; Wittmer C; Kraft S; Krech T; Steurer S; Sauter G; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e13-9. PubMed ID: 25960411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Heterogeneity in Definitions of High-risk Prostate Cancer and Varying Impact on Mortality Rates after Radical Prostatectomy.
Mossanen M; Nepple KG; Grubb RL; Androile GL; Kallogjeri D; Klein EA; Stephenson AJ; Kibel AS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):143-148. PubMed ID: 31100238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The CPC Risk Calculator: A New App to Predict Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence During Follow-up After Radical Prostatectomy.
Røder MA; Berg KD; Loft MD; Thomsen FB; Ferrari M; Kurbegovic S; Rytgaard HC; Gruschy L; Brasso K; Gerds TA; Kjær A; Brooks JD; Iversen P
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Apr; 4(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 28753827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathological stage distribution in patients treated with radical prostatectomy reflecting the need for protocol-based active surveillance: results from a contemporary European patient cohort.
Seiler D; Randazzo M; Klotz L; Grobholz R; Baumgartner M; Isbarn H; Recker F; Kwiatkowski M
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 22093744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contemporary Management of Prostate Cancer Patients Suitable for Active Surveillance: A North American Population-based Study.
Moschini M; Fossati N; Sood A; Lee JK; Sammon J; Sun M; Pucheril D; Dalela D; Montorsi F; Karnes RJ; Briganti A; Trinh QD; Menon M; Abdollah F
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jan; 4(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 28753764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trend of Adverse Stage Migration in Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer.
Preisser F; Marchioni M; Nazzani S; Bandini M; Tian Z; Saad F; Pompe RS; Briganti A; Budäus L; Montorsi F; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):160-168. PubMed ID: 31100241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
