206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28802429)
1. Paramedics' working strategies while loading a stretcher into an ambulance.
Prairie J; Plamondon A; Larouche D; Hegg-Deloye S; Corbeil P
Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():112-122. PubMed ID: 28802429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the biomechanical and psychophysical demands imposed on paramedics when using manual and powered stretchers.
Lad U; Oomen NMCW; Callaghan JP; Fischer SL
Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():167-174. PubMed ID: 29866307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical and subjective assessment and comparison of three ambulance cot design configurations.
Sommerich CM; Lavender SA; Radin Umar RZ; Le P; Mehta J; Ko PL; Farfan R; Dutt M; Park S
Ergonomics; 2012; 55(11):1350-61. PubMed ID: 22849316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceived exertion using two different EMS stretcher systems, report from a Swedish study.
Hulldin M; Kängström J; Andersson Hagiwara M; Claesson A
Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jun; 36(6):1040-1044. PubMed ID: 29510910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repetitive Risks. For this EMS crew, unloading the stretcher proved dangerous to both patient and provider.
Page D; Krost W
EMS World; 2016 Jan; 45(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 26852541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of occupational injuries in an urban emergency medical services system before and after implementation of electrically powered stretchers.
Studnek JR; Mac Crawford J; Fernandez AR
Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):198-202. PubMed ID: 21632034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A biomechanical and subjective comparison of two powered ambulance cots.
Sommerich CM; Lavender SA; Radin Umar RZ; Li J; Park S; Dutt M
Ergonomics; 2015; 58(11):1885-96. PubMed ID: 26245484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occupational injury risk among ambulance officers and paramedics compared with other healthcare workers in Victoria, Australia: analysis of workers' compensation claims from 2003 to 2012.
Roberts MH; Sim MR; Black O; Smith P
Occup Environ Med; 2015 Jul; 72(7):489-95. PubMed ID: 25780033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementing powered stretcher and load systems was a cost effective intervention to reduce the incidence rates of stretcher related injuries in a paramedic service.
Armstrong DP; Ferron R; Taylor C; McLeod B; Fletcher S; MacPhee RS; Fischer SL
Appl Ergon; 2017 Jul; 62():34-42. PubMed ID: 28411738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient acuity as a determinant of paramedics' frequency of being exposed to physically demanding work activities.
Morales L; McEachern BM; MacPhee RS; Fischer SL
Appl Ergon; 2016 Sep; 56():187-93. PubMed ID: 27184327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. To what extent do paramedics apply safe handling principles when transferring patients from stair chairs to stretchers?
Larouche D; Corbeil P; Bellemare M; Authier M; Prairie J; Hegg-Deloye S
Ergonomics; 2019 Oct; 62(10):1313-1326. PubMed ID: 31282825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders and injuries among emergency medical technicians and paramedics: A comprehensive narrative review.
Friedenberg R; Kalichman L; Ezra D; Wacht O; Alperovitch-Najenson D
Arch Environ Occup Health; 2022; 77(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 33073742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of power stretchers on occupational injury rates in an urban emergency medical services system.
Pryce R; Weldon E; McDonald N; Sneath R
Am J Ind Med; 2024 Apr; 67(4):341-349. PubMed ID: 38356274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Qualitative study of paramedics' experiences of managing seizures: a national perspective from England.
Noble AJ; Snape D; Goodacre S; Jackson M; Sherratt FC; Pearson M; Marson A
BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e014022. PubMed ID: 28186950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring implicit preventive strategies in prehospital emergency workers: a novel approach for preventing back problems.
Arial M; Benoît D; Wild P
Appl Ergon; 2014 Jul; 45(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 24439126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [(Un)ergonomic working conditions for a paramedic in a medical ambulance].
Bęczkowska S; Celiński D; Grabarek I; Grzybowska K; Zysk Z
Med Pr; 2024 Mar; 75(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 38523499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ambulance stretcher adverse events.
Wang HE; Weaver MD; Abo BN; Kaliappan R; Fairbanks RJ
Qual Saf Health Care; 2009 Jun; 18(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 19468005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk assessment of patient handling with ambulance stretcher systems (ramp/(winch), easi-loader, tail-lift) using biomechanical failure criteria.
Cooper G; Ghassemieh E
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Sep; 29(7):775-87. PubMed ID: 17064948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treating the clock and not the patient: ambulance response times and risk.
Price L
Qual Saf Health Care; 2006 Apr; 15(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 16585114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Road ambulances: working conditions of paramedics - pilot studies.
Bęczkowska S; Grabarek I; Pilip S; Szpakowski L; Gałązkowski R
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2020 Jan; 33(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 31942870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
