221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28802606)
1. Comparison of LMA Supreme™ with i-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in children for airway management during general anaesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Bhattacharjee S; Som A; Maitra S
J Clin Anesth; 2017 Sep; 41():5-10. PubMed ID: 28802606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of I-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in patients: A meta-analysis.
Tan Y; Jiang J; Wang R
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278871. PubMed ID: 36520843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
Damodaran S; Sethi S; Malhotra SK; Samra T; Maitra S; Saini V
Saudi J Anaesth; 2017; 11(4):390-395. PubMed ID: 29033717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the performance of the I-gel™ vs. the LMA-S™during anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Chen X; Jiao J; Cong X; Liu L; Wu X
PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71910. PubMed ID: 23951266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector™ vs the LMA Supreme™; a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Moser B; Keller C; Audigé L; Bruppacher HR
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Mar; 63(3):322-328. PubMed ID: 30229857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.
Maitra S; Baidya DK; Arora MK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of clinical performance of size 1.5 Supreme™ LMA and Proseal™ LMA among Asian children: a randomized controlled trial.
Chaw SH; Shariffuddin II; Foo LL; Lee PK; Paran RM; Cheang PC; Chan L
J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Dec; 32(6):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 29404890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Supreme™ and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airways in infants: a prospective randomised clinical study.
Oba S; Turk HS; Isil CT; Erdogan H; Sayin P; Dokucu AI
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 28870163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Different Head and Neck Positions in Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Population.
Gupta S; Dogra N; Chauhan K
Anesth Essays Res; 2017; 11(3):647-650. PubMed ID: 28928564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized prospective trial comparing two supraglottic airway devices: i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in paralyzed patients.
Joly N; Poulin LP; Tanoubi I; Drolet P; Donati F; St-Pierre P
Can J Anaesth; 2014 Sep; 61(9):794-800. PubMed ID: 25141831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II™ size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children.
Gasteiger L; Ofner S; Stögermüller B; Ziegler B; Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anaesthesist; 2016 Aug; 65(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 27380049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. LMA Supreme™ vs i-gel™--a comparison of insertion success in novices.
Ragazzi R; Finessi L; Farinelli I; Alvisi R; Volta CA
Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 22329593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pediatric supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice: A prospective observational study.
Kleine-Brueggeney M; Gottfried A; Nabecker S; Greif R; Book M; Theiler L
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):119. PubMed ID: 28865448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A network meta-analysis of the clinical properties of various types of supraglottic airway device in children.
Mihara T; Asakura A; Owada G; Yokoi A; Ka K; Goto T
Anaesthesia; 2017 Oct; 72(10):1251-1264. PubMed ID: 28737223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of LMA ProSeal™ and i-gel® in adults: Meta-analysis and systematic review.
Shin HW; Yoo HN; Bae GE; Chang JC; Park MK; You HS; Kim HJ; Ahn HS
J Int Med Res; 2016 Jun; 44(3):405-18. PubMed ID: 27009026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery.
Liew GH; Yu ED; Shah SS; Kothandan H
Singapore Med J; 2016 Aug; 57(8):432-7. PubMed ID: 27549212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Brief review: The LMA Supreme™ supraglottic airway.
Wong DT; Yang JJ; Jagannathan N
Can J Anaesth; 2012 May; 59(5):483-93. PubMed ID: 22318376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.
Acx E; Van Caelenberg E; De Baerdemaeker L; Coppens M
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized comparative study of three supraglottic airway devices for controlled ventilation in anesthetized patients.
Sharma M; Sharma B; Gupta M; Panday BC; Sahai C; Sood J
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2022; 38(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 36171925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of i-gel™ and LMA Supreme™ in anesthetized and paralyzed children.
Kim H; Lee JY; Lee SY; Park SY; Lee SC; Chung CJ
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2014 Nov; 67(5):317-22. PubMed ID: 25473460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
