384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28802716)
21. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
Thomé C; Zevgaridis D; Leheta O; Bäzner H; Pöckler-Schöniger C; Wöhrle J; Schmiedek P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Is the Use of a Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Approach Associated with Rapid Recovery After Lumbar Decompressive Laminectomy? A Preliminary Analysis of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Park SM; Kim GU; Kim HJ; Choi JH; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
World Neurosurg; 2019 Aug; 128():e709-e718. PubMed ID: 31077891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of spinal decompression on back pain in lumbar spinal stenosis: a Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) study.
Srinivas S; Paquet J; Bailey C; Nataraj A; Stratton A; Johnson M; Salo P; Christie S; Fisher C; Hall H; Manson N; Rampersaud YR; Thomas K; McIntosh G; Dea N
Spine J; 2019 Jun; 19(6):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 30664950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Extent of decompression and incidence of postoperative epidural hematoma among different techniques of spinal decompression in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Leonardi MA; Zanetti M; Min K
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Dec; 26(8):407-14. PubMed ID: 22692194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Blumenthal C; Curran J; Benzel EC; Potter R; Magge SN; Harrington JF; Coumans JV; Ghogawala Z
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 23373567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effectiveness of single posterior decompressive laminectomy in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study.
Kaymaz M; Borcek AO; Emmez H; Durdag E; Pasaoglu A
Turk Neurosurg; 2012; 22(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 22843459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spinous process splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a critical appraisal.
Lee DY; Lee SH
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Aug; 51(4):204-7. PubMed ID: 18683110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modified unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note.
Liu X; Yuan S; Tian Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E732-7. PubMed ID: 23466507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The natural history of asymptomatic lumbar canal stenosis in patients undergoing surgery for cervical myelopathy.
Tsutsumimoto T; Shimogata M; Yui M; Ohta H; Misawa H
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 22371547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative Analysis of Microendoscopic and Open Laminectomy for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis at L1-L2 or L2-L3.
Yamato Y; Nagata K; Kawamura N; Higashikawa A; Takeshita Y; Tozawa K; Fukushima M; Urayama D; Ono T; Hara N; Okamoto N; Azuma S; Iwai H; Sugita S; Yoshida Y; Hirai S; Masuda K; Jim Y; Ohtomo N; Nakamoto H; Kato S; Taniguchi Y; Tanaka S; Oshima Y
World Neurosurg; 2024 Mar; 183():e408-e414. PubMed ID: 38143029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The diagnosis of double-crush lesion in the L5 lumbar nerve using diffusion tensor imaging.
Kanamoto H; Eguchi Y; Suzuki M; Oikawa Y; Yamanaka H; Tamai H; Kobayashi T; Orita S; Yamauchi K; Suzuki M; Aoki Y; Watanabe A; Takahashi K; Ohtori S
Spine J; 2016 Mar; 16(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 26592484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study.
Castro-Menéndez M; Bravo-Ricoy JA; Casal-Moro R; Hernández-Blanco M; Jorge-Barreiro FJ
Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Transverse decompression technique in the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Müjde S; Erel N; Ozan F
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(6):614-9. PubMed ID: 26511687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Surgical outcomes of modified lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kanbara S; Yukawa Y; Ito K; Machino M; Kato F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 25594729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of symptomatic cerebral spinal fluid leak between patients undergoing minimally invasive versus open lumbar foraminotomy, discectomy, or laminectomy.
Wong AP; Shih P; Smith TR; Slimack NP; Dahdaleh NS; Aoun SG; El Ahmadieh TY; Smith ZA; Scheer JK; Koski TR; Liu JC; Fessler RG
World Neurosurg; 2014; 81(3-4):634-40. PubMed ID: 24239738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.
Nerland US; Jakola AS; Solheim O; Weber C; Rao V; Lønne G; Solberg TK; Salvesen Ø; Carlsen SM; Nygaard ØP; Gulati S
BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1603. PubMed ID: 25833966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative outcome and radiographic comparisons between laminectomy and laminotomy in the treatment of acquired lumbar stenosis.
Thomas NW; Rea GL; Pikul BK; Mervis LJ; Irsik R; McGregor JM
Neurosurgery; 1997 Sep; 41(3):567-74; discussion 574-5. PubMed ID: 9310973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Minimally invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative scoliosis: Predictive factors of radiographic and clinical outcomes.
Minamide A; Yoshida M; Iwahashi H; Simpson AK; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Kagotani R; Sonekatsu M; Sasaki T; Shinto K; Deguchi T
J Orthop Sci; 2017 May; 22(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28161236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
