488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28802870)
1. Audio-visual synchrony and spatial attention enhance processing of dynamic visual stimulation independently and in parallel: A frequency-tagging study.
Covic A; Keitel C; Porcu E; Schröger E; Müller MM
Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 161():32-42. PubMed ID: 28802870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Audio-visual synchrony and feature-selective attention co-amplify early visual processing.
Keitel C; Müller MM
Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1221-31. PubMed ID: 26226930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Co-stimulation-removed audiovisual semantic integration and modulation of attention: An event-related potential study.
Xi Y; Li Q; Gao N; Li G; Lin W; Wu J
Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 May; 151():7-17. PubMed ID: 32061614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stimulus-Driven Brain Rhythms within the Alpha Band: The Attentional-Modulation Conundrum.
Keitel C; Keitel A; Benwell CSY; Daube C; Thut G; Gross J
J Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 39(16):3119-3129. PubMed ID: 30770401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
Fujisaki W; Nishida S
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Good times for multisensory integration: Effects of the precision of temporal synchrony as revealed by gamma-band oscillations.
Senkowski D; Talsma D; Grigutsch M; Herrmann CS; Woldorff MG
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):561-71. PubMed ID: 16542688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Updating the dual-mechanism model for cross-sensory attentional spreading: The influence of space-based visual selective attention.
Zhao S; Li Y; Wang C; Feng C; Feng W
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Dec; 42(18):6038-6052. PubMed ID: 34553806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Steady-state evoked potentials as an index of multisensory temporal binding.
Nozaradan S; Peretz I; Mouraux A
Neuroimage; 2012 Mar; 60(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 22155324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cross-modal spread of attention reveals differential constraints for the temporal and spatial linking of visual and auditory stimulus events.
Donohue SE; Roberts KC; Grent-'t-Jong T; Woldorff MG
J Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 31(22):7982-90. PubMed ID: 21632920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No intermodal interference effects of threatening information during concurrent audiovisual stimulation.
Riels KM; Rocha HA; Keil A
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Jan; 136():107283. PubMed ID: 31783079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatio-temporal dynamics of visual selective attention identified by a common spatial pattern decomposition method.
Li L; Yao D; Yin G
Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1282():84-94. PubMed ID: 19501069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neural signatures of face-voice synchrony in 5-month-old human infants.
Hyde DC; Jones BL; Flom R; Porter CL
Dev Psychobiol; 2011 May; 53(4):359-70. PubMed ID: 21271561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beyond alpha band: prestimulus local oscillation and interregional synchrony of the beta band shape the temporal perception of the audiovisual beep-flash stimulus.
Jiang Z; An X; Liu S; Yin E; Yan Y; Ming D
J Neural Eng; 2024 Jun; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 37419108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multisensory processing and oscillatory gamma responses: effects of spatial selective attention.
Senkowski D; Talsma D; Herrmann CS; Woldorff MG
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):411-26. PubMed ID: 16151775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attentional modulation of neural responses to illusory shapes: Evidence from steady-state and evoked visual potentials.
Wittenhagen L; Mattingley JB
Neuropsychologia; 2019 Mar; 125():70-80. PubMed ID: 30711611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Being First Matters: Topographical Representational Similarity Analysis of ERP Signals Reveals Separate Networks for Audiovisual Temporal Binding Depending on the Leading Sense.
Cecere R; Gross J; Willis A; Thut G
J Neurosci; 2017 May; 37(21):5274-5287. PubMed ID: 28450537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task.
Potts GF; Wood SM; Kothmann D; Martin LE
Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():126-39. PubMed ID: 18723003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency tagging of steady-state evoked potentials to explore the crossmodal links in spatial attention between vision and touch.
Colon E; Legrain V; Huang G; Mouraux A
Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1498-510. PubMed ID: 26329531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sustained Splits of Attention within versus across Visual Hemifields Produce Distinct Spatial Gain Profiles.
Walter S; Keitel C; Müller MM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 26401813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
