179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28802943)
1. Pregnancy outcomes after transvaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy.
Cavkaytar S; Kokanalı MK; Tasdemir U; Doganay M; Aksakal O
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Sep; 216():204-207. PubMed ID: 28802943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse.
Jirschele K; Seitz M; Zhou Y; Rosenblatt P; Culligan P; Sand P
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 May; 26(5):743-8. PubMed ID: 25394892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.
Dietz V; de Jong J; Huisman M; Schraffordt Koops S; Heintz P; van der Vaart H
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Nov; 18(11):1271-6. PubMed ID: 17384894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol).
van IJsselmuiden MN; Coolen AL; Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Bongers M; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Deprest J; van Eijndhoven HW
BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep; 14():112. PubMed ID: 25231240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse?
Maher CF; Cary MP; Slack MC; Murray CJ; Milligan M; Schluter P
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2001; 12(6):381-4; discussion 384-5. PubMed ID: 11795641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse.
Hickman LC; Tran MC; Paraiso MFR; Walters MD; Ferrando CA
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):2005-2012. PubMed ID: 34586437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Manchester Procedure vs Sacrospinous Hysteropexy for Treatment of Uterine Descent: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Enklaar RA; Schulten SFM; van Eijndhoven HWF; Weemhoff M; van Leijsen SAL; van der Weide MC; van Bavel J; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Adang EMM; Kluivers KB;
JAMA; 2023 Aug; 330(7):626-635. PubMed ID: 37581670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms.
van Brummen HJ; van de Pol G; Aalders CI; Heintz AP; van der Vaart CH
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2003 Nov; 14(5):350-5; discussion 355. PubMed ID: 14618315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy: a retrospective feasibility study.
Milani R; Frigerio M; Manodoro S; Cola A; Spelzini F
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):73-76. PubMed ID: 27193162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hysteropexy: Evidence and Insights.
Ridgeway BM; Cadish L
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 60(2):312-323. PubMed ID: 28263199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined sacrospinous hysteropexy and cystopexy using a single anterior incision.
Petruzzelli P; Chiadò Fiorio Tin M; Cosma S; Parisi S; Garofalo A; Todros T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Oct; 135(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 27352736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bladder function after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal wall repair in women with uterovaginal prolapse.
Sayed Ahmed WA; Taha OT; Hamdy MA; Ibrahim ZM; Elshahat AM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 May; 224():170-174. PubMed ID: 29609185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concomitant pericervical reconstruction with sacrospinous hysteropexy: Anatomical and functional results.
Ghanbari Z; Veisi F; Eftekhar T; Deldar M; Mostaan F; Adabi K
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 62(2):252-255. PubMed ID: 36965891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Native tissue sacrospinous hysteropexy from an anterior approach.
Plair A; Matthews C
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1591-1593. PubMed ID: 33219824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse.
Ridgeway BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 213(6):802-9. PubMed ID: 26226554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transvaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy.
Murphy AM; Goldman HB
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Apr; 24(4):529-30. PubMed ID: 23224021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse?
Gutman RE
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27467823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
