These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28802943)

  • 21. Functional outcome after sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descensus.
    Dietz V; Huisman M; de Jong JM; Heintz PM; van der Vaart CH
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2008 Jun; 19(6):747-52. PubMed ID: 18297228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Successful treatment of uterine prolapse by abdominal hysteropexy performed during cesarean section.
    Karataylı R; Gezginç K; Kantarcı AH; Acar A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Feb; 287(2):319-22. PubMed ID: 23008111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.
    Kapoor S; Sivanesan K; Robertson JA; Veerasingham M; Kapoor V
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 28258346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Short-term outcomes of sacrospinous hysteropexy through an anterior approach.
    Plair A; Dutta R; Overholt TL; Matthews C
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1555-1563. PubMed ID: 33439280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hysteropexy. A review.
    Ridgeway B; Frick AC; Walter MD
    Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Dec; 60(6):509-28. PubMed ID: 18981978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sacrospinous hysteropexy - an alternative in primary surgical treatment of apical compartment prolapse.
    Homola Prokop; Hensel Germund; Košťál Milan
    Ceska Gynekol; 2021; 86(3):200-204. PubMed ID: 34167313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial).
    van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden A; Veen J; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Housmans S; van Kuijk S; Deprest J; Bongers MY; van Eijndhoven H
    BJOG; 2020 Sep; 127(10):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 32267624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of uterine preservation on long-term subjective outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Ng SC; Tsui KP; Huang L; Chen GD
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():167-171. PubMed ID: 31299523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sacrospinous Fixation and Vaginal Uterosacral Suspension-Evaluation in Uterine Preservation Surgery.
    Woodburn KL; Yuan AS; Torosis M; Roberts K; Ferrando CA; Gutman RE
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 May; 29(5):469-478. PubMed ID: 36516026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Role of Hysteropexy in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Gan ZS; Roberson DS; Smith AL
    Curr Urol Rep; 2022 Sep; 23(9):175-183. PubMed ID: 35789456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laparoscopic sacral suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse.
    Krause HG; Goh JT; Sloane K; Higgs P; Carey MP
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2006 Jun; 17(4):378-81. PubMed ID: 16319998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Female sexual function after repair of uterovaginal prolapse.
    Hamdy MA; Ahmed WAS; Abolill ZM; Elshahat AM; Taha OT
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Dec; 48(12):3286-3291. PubMed ID: 36065788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Anterior vaginal mesh sacrospinous hysteropexy and posterior fascial plication for anterior compartment dominated uterovaginal prolapse.
    Feiner B; Gietelink L; Maher C
    Int Urogynecol J; 2010 Feb; 21(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 19834636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Does hysterectomy modifies the anatomical and functional outcomes of prolapse surgery?: Clinical Practice Guidelines].
    Cayrac M; Warembourg S; Le Normand L; Fatton B
    Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S73-88. PubMed ID: 27595628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sexual functioning after vaginal hysterectomy or transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension for uterine prolapse: a comparison.
    Jeng CJ; Yang YC; Tzeng CR; Shen J; Wang LR
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Sep; 50(9):669-74. PubMed ID: 16363755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficacy and pregnancy outcomes of laparoscopic single sheet mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Pandeva I; Mistry M; Fayyad A
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Mar; 36(3):787-793. PubMed ID: 27224927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Risk of Primary Uterine and Cervical Cancer After Hysteropexy.
    Kurian R; Kirchhoff-Rowald A; Sahil S; Cheng AL; Wang X; Shepherd JP; Sutkin G
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 27(3):e493-e496. PubMed ID: 33620910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development and validation of the Value of Uterus instrument and visual analog scale to measure patients' valuation of their uterus.
    Chang OH; Walters MD; Yao M; Lapin B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Nov; 227(5):746.e1-746.e9. PubMed ID: 35764134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: an evolving concept.
    Hefni M; El-Toukhy T; Bhaumik J; Katsimanis E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 188(3):645-50. PubMed ID: 12634635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review.
    Azadi A; Marchand G; Masoud AT; Sainz K; Govindan M; Ware K; King A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Calteux N; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Ostergard DR
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():90-98. PubMed ID: 34736035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.