These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28803526)

  • 1. Familiarity and Within-Person Facial Variability: The Importance of the Internal and External Features.
    Kramer RSS; Manesi Z; Towler A; Reynolds MG; Burton AM
    Perception; 2018 Jan; 47(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 28803526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances.
    Andrews S; Jenkins R; Cursiter H; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):2041-50. PubMed ID: 25607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term information and distributed neural activation are relevant for the "internal features advantage" in face processing: electrophysiological and source reconstruction evidence.
    Olivares EI; Saavedra C; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Iglesias J
    Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2735-47. PubMed ID: 24025156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An adaptation study of internal and external features in facial representations.
    Hills C; Romano K; Davies-Thompson J; Barton JJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():18-28. PubMed ID: 24747020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift.
    Bonner L; Burton M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1019-29. PubMed ID: 15370514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of internal and external features in recognizing faces that vary in familiarity and race.
    Latif M; Moulson MC
    Perception; 2022 Nov; 51(11):820-840. PubMed ID: 36154747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Young children's difficulty in disregarding information from external features when matching unfamiliar faces.
    Sugimura T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 23896414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.
    Young AW; Hay DC; McWeeny KH; Flude BM; Ellis AW
    Perception; 1985; 14(6):737-46. PubMed ID: 3837875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring levels of face familiarity by using an indirect face-matching measure.
    Clutterbuck R; Johnston RA
    Perception; 2002; 31(8):985-94. PubMed ID: 12269591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data.
    Stacey PC; Walker S; Underwood JD
    Br J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 96(Pt 4):407-22. PubMed ID: 16248933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The importance of internal facial features in learning new faces.
    Longmore CA; Liu CH; Young AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 25203612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Configurational coding, familiarity and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition in sheep.
    Peirce JW; Leigh AE; Kendrick KM
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(4):475-83. PubMed ID: 10683397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.
    Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding face familiarity.
    Kramer RSS; Young AW; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():46-58. PubMed ID: 29232594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Activity in the right fusiform face area predicts the behavioural advantage for the perception of familiar faces.
    Weibert K; Andrews TJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():588-96. PubMed ID: 26187507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contribution of external and internal features to the matching of unfamiliar faces.
    Nachson I; Moscovitch M; Umilta C
    Psychol Res; 1995; 58(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 7675930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recovering faces from memory: the distracting influence of external facial features.
    Frowd CD; Skelton F; Atherton C; Pitchford M; Hepton G; Holden L; McIntyre AH; Hancock PJ
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Jun; 18(2):224-38. PubMed ID: 22545929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.