These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
526 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28803814)
1. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Monoblock Splined Tapered Grit-Blasted Titanium Stem. Hellman MD; Kearns SM; Bohl DD; Haughom BD; Levine BR J Arthroplasty; 2017 Dec; 32(12):3698-3703. PubMed ID: 28803814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs. Sandiford NA; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):186-192. PubMed ID: 27672012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What Is the Difference Between Modular and Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Huang Y; Zhou Y; Shao H; Gu J; Tang H; Tang Q J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3108-3113. PubMed ID: 28602532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is There a Benefit to Modularity for Femoral Revisions When Using a Splined, Tapered Titanium Stem? Cohn MR; Tetreault MW; Li J; Kunze KN; Nahhas CR; Michalski JF; Levine BR; Nam D J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S278-S283. PubMed ID: 32067894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimum 2-Year Outcomes of a Modern Monoblock Titanium Fluted Tapered Revision Stem for Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Alqahtani Y; Somerville LE; Vasarhelyi EM; Howard JL; Lanting BA; Naudie DDR; MacDonald SJ; McCalden RW J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S1):S208-S212. PubMed ID: 38521249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term outcomes with the REDAPT monolithic, tapered, fluted, grit-blasted, forged titanium revision femoral stem. Gabor JA; Padilla JA; Feng JE; Schnaser E; Lutes WB; Park KJ; Incavo S; Vigdorchik J; Schwarzkopf R Bone Joint J; 2020 Feb; 102-B(2):191-197. PubMed ID: 32009430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with femoral bone loss using tapered rectangular femoral stem: a minimum 10 years' follow-up. Wang J; Dai WL; Lin ZM; Shi ZJ Hip Int; 2020 Sep; 30(5):622-628. PubMed ID: 32686507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Abdel MP; Cottino U; Larson DR; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):873-881. PubMed ID: 28509828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions? Huddleston JI; Tetreault MW; Yu M; Bedair H; Hansen VJ; Choi HR; Goodman SB; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 26245164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term survivorship of a monoblock long cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. Herry Y; Viste A; Bothorel H; Desmarchelier R; Fessy MH Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2279-2284. PubMed ID: 30276449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revision hip arthroplasty with a rectangular tapered cementless stem: a retrospective study of the SLR-Plus stem at a mean follow-up of 4.1 years. Uriarte I; Moreta J; Cortés L; Bernuy L; Aguirre U; Martínez de Los Mozos JL Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):281-289. PubMed ID: 31617019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Monoblock Fluted Titanium-Tapered Stem for Paprosky IIIa, IIIb, and IV Femoral Bone Defects. Passano B; Oakley CT; Lutes WB; Incavo SJ; Park KJ; Schwarzkopf R J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7):1342-1348. PubMed ID: 36731584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Contemporary Triple-Tapered Titanium Stem. Carlson SW; Goetz DD; Liu SS; Greiner JJ; Callaghan JJ J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2231-6. PubMed ID: 27339824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proximal femoral replacement in contemporary revision total hip arthroplasty for severe femoral bone loss: a review of outcomes. Viste A; Perry KI; Taunton MJ; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP Bone Joint J; 2017 Mar; 99-B(3):325-329. PubMed ID: 28249971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA. Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Satisfactory Results of the Exeter Revision Femoral Stem Used for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. Desy NM; Johnson JD; Sierra RJ J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):494-498. PubMed ID: 27600303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonmodular Stems Are a Viable Alternative to Modular Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clair AJ; Cizmic Z; Vigdorchik JM; Poultsides LA; Schwarzkopf R; Rathod PA; Deshmukh AJ J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S292-S296. PubMed ID: 31010773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with extensive proximal femoral bone loss using a fluted tapered modular femoral component. Amanatullah DF; Howard JL; Siman H; Trousdale RT; Mabry TM; Berry DJ Bone Joint J; 2015 Mar; 97-B(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 25737513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What Is the Long-term (27- to 32-year) Survivorship of an Uncemented Tapered Titanium Femoral Component and Survival in Patients Younger Than 50 Years? Streit MR; Lehner B; Peitgen DS; Innmann MM; Omlor GW; Walker T; Merle C; Moradi B Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 32187099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subsidence Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular and Monolithic Components. Clair AJ; Gabor JA; Patel KS; Friedlander S; Deshmukh AJ; Schwarzkopf R J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S299-S303. PubMed ID: 32253066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]