270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28803846)
1. Embryo survival and birth rate after minimum volume vitrification or slow freezing of in vivo and in vitro produced ovine embryos.
Dos Santos-Neto PC; Cuadro F; Barrera N; Crispo M; Menchaca A
Cryobiology; 2017 Oct; 78():8-14. PubMed ID: 28803846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimum volume Spatula MVD vitrification method improves embryo survival compared to traditional slow freezing, both for in vivo and in vitro produced mice embryos.
Meikle MN; Schlapp G; Menchaca A; Crispo M
Cryobiology; 2018 Oct; 84():77-81. PubMed ID: 30040919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cryotolerance of Day 2 or Day 6 in vitro produced ovine embryos after vitrification by Cryotop or Spatula methods.
Dos Santos Neto PC; Vilariño M; Barrera N; Cuadro F; Crispo M; Menchaca A
Cryobiology; 2015 Feb; 70(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 25448379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM
Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The freezing method of cleavage stage embryos has no impact on the weight of the newborns.
Kaartinen N; Kananen K; Huhtala H; Keränen S; Tinkanen H
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Mar; 33(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 26749388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Slow freezing should not be totally substituted by vitrification when applied to day 3 embryo cryopreservation: an analysis of 5613 frozen cycles.
Zhu HY; Xue YM; Yang LY; Jiang LY; Ling C; Tong XM; Zhang SY
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Sep; 32(9):1371-7. PubMed ID: 26238389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of frozen embryo transfer outcomes at blastocyst stage according to freezing method and type of endometrial preparation].
Pouget O; Scalici E; Hoa-Ferrieres A; Deutsch-Bringer S; Gala A; Dechaud H; Hamamah S
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 25708846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pregnancy of cryopreserved ovine embryos at different developmental stages.
Guo Y; Bai J; Zhang Z; Liu Y; Lu S; Liu C; Ni J; Zhou P; Fu X; Sun WQ; Wan P; Shi G
Cryo Letters; 2022; 43(5):269-275. PubMed ID: 36626131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of vitrification and conventional freezing for cryopreservation of caprine embryos.
Araújo-Lemos PF; Freitas Neto LM; Moura MT; Melo JV; Lima PF; Oliveira MA
Zygote; 2015 Aug; 23(4):594-602. PubMed ID: 24964134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cryopreservation of bovine in vitro produced embryos using ethylene glycol in controlled freezing or vitrification.
Sommerfeld V; Niemann H
Cryobiology; 1999 Mar; 38(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 10191033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In-straw cryoprotectant dilution for bovine embryos vitrified using Cryotop.
Inaba Y; Aikawa Y; Hirai T; Hashiyada Y; Yamanouchi T; Misumi K; Ohtake M; Somfai T; Kobayashi S; Saito N; Matoba S; Konishi K; Imai K
J Reprod Dev; 2011 Sep; 57(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 21467736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cryopreservation of ovine embryos: slow freezing and vitrification.
Martínez AG; Matkovic M
Theriogenology; 1998 Apr; 49(5):1039-49. PubMed ID: 10732111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Embryo vitrification using a novel semi-automated closed system yields in vitro outcomes equivalent to the manual Cryotop method.
Roy TK; Brandi S; Tappe NM; Bradley CK; Vom E; Henderson C; Lewis C; Battista K; Hobbs B; Hobbs S; Syer J; Lanyon SR; Dopheide SM; Peura TT; McArthur SJ; Bowman MC; Stojanov T
Hum Reprod; 2014 Nov; 29(11):2431-8. PubMed ID: 25164022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vitrification of in vivo and in vitro produced ovine blastocysts.
Zhu SE; Zeng SM; Yu WL; Li SJ; Zhang ZC; Chen YF
Anim Biotechnol; 2001 Nov; 12(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 11808635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Full-term potential of goat in vitro produced embryos after different cryopreservation methods.
Ferreira-Silva JC; Moura MT; Silva TD; Oliveira LRS; Chiamenti A; Figueirêdo Freitas VJ; Oliveira MAL
Cryobiology; 2017 Apr; 75():75-79. PubMed ID: 28137429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of embryo intactness and developmental potential following slow freezing and vitrification.
Yu L; Jia C; Lan Y; Song R; Zhou L; Li Y; Liang Y; Wang S
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2017 Oct; 63(5):285-293. PubMed ID: 28795845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vitrification of human embryos previously cryostored by either slow freezing or vitrification results in high pregnancy rates.
Stanger J; Wong J; Conceicao J; Yovich J
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Mar; 24(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 22289155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation.
Balaban B; Urman B; Ata B; Isiklar A; Larman MG; Hamilton R; Gardner DK
Hum Reprod; 2008 Sep; 23(9):1976-82. PubMed ID: 18544577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
