194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28803960)
1. Evaluating impacts of different longitudinal driver assistance systems on reducing multi-vehicle rear-end crashes during small-scale inclement weather.
Li Y; Xing L; Wang W; Wang H; Dong C; Liu S
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():63-76. PubMed ID: 28803960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
Cicchino JB
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Forward collision warning system impact.
Hubele N; Kennedy K
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S78-S83. PubMed ID: 30001148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of front crash prevention systems in reducing large truck real-world crash rates.
Teoh ER
Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(4):284-289. PubMed ID: 33769151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
Kusano KD; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking.
Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S112-S118. PubMed ID: 31381436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Real-world effects of rear cross-traffic alert on police-reported backing crashes.
Cicchino JB
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():350-355. PubMed ID: 30580146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking on rear-end crashes involving pickup trucks.
Cicchino JB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):293-298. PubMed ID: 36853168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the safety relevance of automatic emergency braking testing programs: An examination of common characteristics of police-reported rear-end crashes in the United States.
Kidd DG
Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S137-S142. PubMed ID: 35767826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantifying Vision Zero: Crash avoidance in rural and motorway accident scenarios by combination of ACC, AEB, and LKS projected to German accident occurrence.
Stark L; Düring M; Schoenawa S; Maschke JE; Do CM
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S126-S132. PubMed ID: 31381430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Are front crash prevention systems less effective at preventing rear-end crashes where trucks and motorcycles are struck?
Cicchino JB; Kidd DG
Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):440-444. PubMed ID: 38466620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing the risk of rear-end collisions with infrastructure-to-vehicle (I2V) integration of variable speed limit control and adaptive cruise control system.
Li Y; Wang H; Wang W; Liu S; Xiang Y
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Aug; 17(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 26761633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Counterfactual simulations applied to SHRP2 crashes: The effect of driver behavior models on safety benefit estimations of intelligent safety systems.
Bärgman J; Boda CN; Dozza M
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():165-180. PubMed ID: 28315616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Longitudinal safety impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control vehicle's degradation.
Tu Y; Wang W; Li Y; Xu C; Xu T; Li X
J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():177-192. PubMed ID: 31235228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Crash and injury prevention estimates for intersection driver assistance systems in left turn across path/opposite direction crashes in the United States.
Bareiss M; Scanlon J; Sherony R; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S133-S138. PubMed ID: 31381453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on reducing rear-end collision risks on freeways.
Li Y; Wang H; Wang W; Xing L; Liu S; Wei X
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jan; 98():87-95. PubMed ID: 27710775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data.
Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():42-7. PubMed ID: 27586101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The real-world safety potential of connected vehicle technology.
Doecke S; Grant A; Anderson RW
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S31-5. PubMed ID: 26027973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
