These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28803960)

  • 21. Characteristics of automatic emergency braking responses in passenger vehicles evaluated in the IIHS front crash prevention program.
    Kidd DG; Perez-Rapela D; Jermakian JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107150. PubMed ID: 37301163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating the safety impact of adaptive cruise control in traffic oscillations on freeways.
    Li Y; Li Z; Wang H; Wang W; Xing L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():137-145. PubMed ID: 28500990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. LAVIA--an evaluation of the potential safety benefits of the French intelligent speed adaptation project.
    Driscoll R; Page Y; Lassarre S; Ehrlich J
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2007; 51():485-505. PubMed ID: 18184509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of adaptive cruise control (ACC) system on fatality and injury reduction in China.
    Tan H; Zhao F; Liu Z
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(4):307-312. PubMed ID: 33819126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intersection AEB implementation strategies for left turn across path crashes.
    Sander U; Lubbe N; Pietzsch S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S119-S125. PubMed ID: 31381448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of the safety benefits of vehicles' advanced driver assistance, connectivity and low level automation systems.
    Yue L; Abdel-Aty M; Wu Y; Wang L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():55-64. PubMed ID: 29654988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Injury mitigation estimates for an intersection driver assistance system in straight crossing path crashes in the United States.
    Scanlon JM; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S9-S17. PubMed ID: 28323447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of rearview cameras and rear parking sensors on police-reported backing crashes.
    Cicchino JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Nov; 18(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 28394632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comprehensive target populations for current active safety systems using national crash databases.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(7):753-61. PubMed ID: 24433115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Can the speed limit be used as a surrogate for the striking vehicle's travel speed or delta-V in police-reported rear-end crashes?
    Kidd DG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):178-183. PubMed ID: 35929865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems.
    Spicer R; Vahabaghaie A; Bahouth G; Drees L; Martinez von Bülow R; Baur P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S91-S95. PubMed ID: 30543454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems.
    Lubbe N
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():23-32. PubMed ID: 28454868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the importance of driver models for the development and assessment of active safety: A new collision warning system to make overtaking cyclists safer.
    Kovaceva J; Bärgman J; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106513. PubMed ID: 34936932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adaptive autonomous emergency braking model based on weather conditions.
    Han L; Fang R; Zhang H; Liu G; Zhu C; Chi R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(7):609-617. PubMed ID: 37436276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. AEB effectiveness evaluation based on car-to-cyclist accident reconstructions using video of drive recorder.
    Zhao Y; Ito D; Mizuno K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 30822153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Developing an improved automatic preventive braking system based on safety-critical car-following events from naturalistic driving study data.
    Zhou W; Wang X; Glaser Y; Wu X; Xu X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Dec; 178():106834. PubMed ID: 36150234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) System Impact on Fatality and Injury Reduction in China.
    Tan H; Zhao F; Hao H; Liu Z; Amer AA; Babiker H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(3):. PubMed ID: 32024226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.